If we are serious about UA regaining all territory, they must be allowed to expand the war into Russia. Itβs the only way a state can be reached where βreturn to the status quo anteβ is a gain for both sides.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
129 points (97.1% liked)
Ukraine
9740 readers
334 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Sanctions do provide some leverage too.
Mostly just hurts the Russian people, Putin doesn't give a shit.
In that sense, same as war. Putin's not going to be hit; there's no direct impact on him. But both cause economic and political pressures for him.
[removed by mod]
Are you alright? The problem with Putin and Russian army is that they're committing war crimes, and you call for war crimes from a "civilized" side as well?
Yes, do it now or pay high cost later. Many Europeans will need to go into active service if this doesn't stop soon. That's not good.
There is another solution right now - give all the arms that Ukraine is requesting. Because they've been cherry-picking, postponing, and saying "this is too effective, you can't have that" for ablong time.
And that's a better solution than your "bomb the civilians"
True, so talk about those alternatives. Not about ruzzian propaganda on tiktok.. Which is what MOST people are now talking about (even the tankies on lemmy)
I'm not using tiktok, I just read a comment about "let's bomb civilians" and responded, because it's inhumane, whatener position you take, group belong to, citizenship you have.
It's not inhumane. Inhumane is shooting people that need food like in Gaza. Inhumane in abducting 20.000 children from Ukraine
Inhumane is NOT ACTING BEFORE Europe gets invaded
They are going to starve then, because the impotent old men who 'lead' Western countries are too afraid of Russia to do much to discomfort them.
You can't starve ruzzia...
HOWEVER RUZZIA STOPPED EXPORTING OIL!!!!!!!!!!
@JustMy2c
Because their refineries are in disrepair.
Tankie alert! Someone is trying to make RUZZIA look better as they are.
Yes, disrepair (and firing all staff)
Yes, drone attacks
Yes, lower price on markets as their COST to extract and ship
Yes, RUZZIANS ARE FINALLY SABOTAGING THEIR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT TO MAKE THEM STOP THE WAR.
This is great news for the world! (except for India, they were profiting a LOT from reselling ruzzian oil)
@JustMy2c
No.
Ukraine is destroying their equipment.
This is not being done by imaginary 'Good Russians.'
All that is not claimed by Ukraine government MUST be sabotage from within the country. Yes, good ruzzians exists. Even inside ruzzia
Could you read again and take note of what I actually said? RUZZIANS are sabotaging.
Oof that's not a great idea. Protecting sovereignty is a hard enough sell internationally. Selling an invasion isn't something the international community is really showing an interest in right now.
They just mean weapons should be used to strike targets in Russia, not an invasion.
I support striking Russian military targets. I don't support a ground invasion. So if what your saying is true I agree.
I donβt support a ground invasion either, but then Russia went and invaded and here we are.
They ought to be driven back to Moscow and actually liberate some people living under a dictator.
Iβd be happy with pushing the orcs a mile across their border with the threat to push them further if they donβt stop.
[deleted]
Yeah they wonβt be using nukes regardless of how the west βescalatesβ. They can leave Ukraine and end this whenever they want.
[deleted]
I agree, putin is looking to glorify his accomplishments as "president". I think the moment he wants to use nukes his ersatz administration will be forced to pull the plug. Hopefully he dies as humiliatingly as all fascists deserve to die.
[deleted]
Agreed, the people of Russia deserve better.
[deleted]
His successor will still be some flavor of authoritarian. My hope is that within the 3rd administration after putin the world will see Russians leading democracy.
That is to say, I'd like to see truly free and fair elections, rights of the people restored, ethnic Russian culture accepted and embraced, progressive social values supported, and freedom of the press protected.
This is the Russia I hope for.
Stalin was much more powerful and feared than Putin is today. Look up how Stalin died if you want an idea of what is in Putin's head right now.
The issue is escalating where Russia feels the need to use nukes. That is a no win for everyone.
If the other option is just letting Russia run continuously unchecked across sovereign nations, then I guess we eat some nukes. However, Russia knows the first nuke they detonate means not even their liege, China, will defend them.
@wintermute_oregon @LaFinlandia
Nukes are a guaranteed lose - lose option. The Russians don't want to lose.
Hitler ordered the complete destruction of Germany before he was finished. You never know what Putin is going to do.
[removed by mod]