101
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 79 points 5 months ago

"its just business"

yeah, if you have zero morals everything is just business you fucking fuck.

[-] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

How the fuck do you stay in business when this is the kind of "investments" you make...?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 5 months ago

money begets money... kinda like evil

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

He's investing in a republican future. Republicans mean more money for people like him. It honestly is a very simple business decision that could lead to big profits in the future.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Easy, you continue to make money and stay alive when you do what your Russian handlers are telling you to do.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Insurance companies understand risk. Trump undoubtedly had to put up some serious collateral to secure the bond. Like casinos, insurance companies know how to come out on top of any transaction.

[-] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Insurance companies understand risk. Trump undoubtedly had to put up some serious collateral to secure the bond. Like casinos

No, Trump’s casinos are worthless 🤣.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Went bankrupt as a casino owner, and half the country thinks he’s some business genius. Smh.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Donald is a dunce who failed at selling steak to Americans.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

He's buying favors. TLDR

[-] zbyte64@social.rootaccess.org 22 points 5 months ago

@Rapidcreek so the guys that appraised Trump's properties in the fraud case are covering his bail? Well at least now we know what premium Trump paid for the bail: he paid with keeping their dirty secrets.

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Supporting rapists is an expensive endeavor and Chubb is just the company to finance it.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

This might not be a popular view here, but I believe the guy. We all know Trump's dubious history about paying people, I'm sure this guy does, too. This company is large enough that Trump can't make them go away by ignoring and delaying it.

And, we might end up with Chubb simply taking a bunch of Trump properties. Could we end up with Chubb Tower? That alone might be worth it.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

Everything Trump touches, dies.

Your company is next, dumb ass.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Just in case you're interested if you're a Chubb Insurance customer I found this document on their public website that lists all of their subsidiary names in the USA and around the globe. file link on their website

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

https://www.yahoo.com/news/e-jean-carroll-lawyers-foil-084917018.html

Uh huh, this is the right thing to do, is it? Including provisions to give your special client 30 more days than normal to collect and 30 more days on top of that to disburse to Carroll should the appeal fail.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I can’t believe the writers called the insurance company “Chubb.” Who would call any company that in real life?

[-] CTDummy@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Funny you say that because there’s company called Chubb security in my country and “ I was like no fucking way” but different Chubb.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Chubb security is named for its founder- a guy whose last name was Chubb, and who invented the Chubb lock.

[-] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

yea, I'm extremely anti-trump, but i don't have a problem with this. Unfortunately the American legal system operates on cash bonds, and i have no doubt they charged him a real high rate.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I don't understand your comment. You're saying a bad thing is okay because it's happening to a bad person.

[-] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Not at all, Im saying its OK for a bond company to help a bad person get a bond, since that's part of the american legal system. I would prefer cash bonds be gotten rid of entirely, since a wealthy person who is a flight risk shouldn't be able to just put money forward, while a poor person stays in jail.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

This is not a bail bond, this is an appeal bond.

Bail bonds keep the accused out of jail before trial. They have a lot of problems.

An appeal bond is used to delay payment that someone owes after a trial, like Trump owes to Carroll.

[-] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Fair enough, thats a difference I wasn't aware of.

Its still how the American legal system works, and if appeal bonds are available, they should be available for all.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
101 points (93.2% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS