150
submitted 9 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

Outrage over killing of Ryan Gainer, shot three times on Saturday, as sheriff denounced for defending deputies’ use of lethal force

Archived version: https://archive.ph/50wkz

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think shooting someone trying to attack you with a hoe generally counts as self-defense, but I don't understand why

“The use of a Taser in this situation with the amount of time or the use of pepper-spray would not have been something we would have been able to react to quick enough. Ultimately we have to stop this problem … law enforcement officers are not required to be hit over the head with something. What happens when they get incapacitated? … The deputies followed through with what their training protocols are.”

This seems like exactly the situation tasers are meant for. Even if attempting to use a taser would have been riskier for the deputies, IMO accepting a reasonable amount of risk is part of their job. "Take the risk of confronting an aggressive teenager, but not the further risk of attempting to subdue him non-lethally" isn't where I would have the line drawn.

[-] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

That statement also admits that this is in line with protocol, Idk who in their right mind would call a protocol acceptable where 3 guys show up to a distress call with guns and can’t manage to deescalate one kid with a hoe without loss of life.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

The question I'm asking is:

Why is there no time for a taser or pepper spray? Those should release just as quickly and easily as a firearm. Moreover, I'm rather confident I could take someone coming at me with a gardening tool, and I'm no police officer. Sure, don't risk a physical altercation, though at what point did that situation warrant the use of a firearm?

And a taser holds little real risk for the officer firing it. Hell, even a gun can have issues.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But in your first sentence you clarified this is okay. No change will happen until you, and every other American, change that thinking.

You don’t understand why a cop killed a kid in a country that will do backflips in order to find justification for said violence?

It’s only one small step from advocacy of a taser to advocacy of a gun.

[-] johnlobo@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

american cop is such a wuss, southeastasian cop handle crazy machete guy without even touching their gun.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

This is a tragic story and I'm against police brutality as much as anyone, but it feels a little sensationalist to word a news article title this way. "Holding a gardening tool" makes me picture someone who was just minding his own business and planting flowers, but a quick google search shows him trying to attack the officers with a garden hoe.

Shame on The Guardian for muddying the waters to try to farm clicks from a terrible situation.

[-] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Yet almost every other police force in the world would've handled this without shooting him...

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Agreed. It's a serious problem, but the discussion gets so muddied by websites with low integrity running headlines that are intentionally dishonest, just for clicks. They know they'll get more outrage and $$ by wording it this way, and it's gross behavior.

How many people across the web do you think saw this headline and assumed, like I did before looking into it, that this was another case of police mistaking some harmless object for a gun? Probably lots.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Glad to see TPM’s got reasonable takes :)

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Thanks. It's rare that I even comment on stuff that I know is going to be a divisive topic, because people get so worked up and it's hard to have a human conversation.

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It was a hula hoe - basically a stick. It was not the kind of hoe with a blade. They killed a kid that they knew was in a mental health crisis for running at them with a stick.

They could have tackled him. They could have tased him. They could have pepper sprayed him. They could have tried entering the home more gently and used de-escalation practices like most medical professionals use. If a patient in crisis picks up an IV pole and threatens hospital workers with it, their response is not to shoot the patient three times.

This is an American cop problem, period.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago
[-] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago

1st frame should be back up and get ready to taze.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
150 points (95.7% liked)

Interesting Global News

2627 readers
571 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS