this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

52592 readers
384 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

[–] Bjoern_Tantau@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Yeah, I was thinking of Jabber as well, when I heard this. For a brief period everything was perfect. Facebook and Google were both using Jabber. And even WhatsApp was using it, I think. So if you had an account somewhere you could actually chat with all your friends, totally unimpeded.

EU should hurry up with their federation laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fratermus 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They are free to set up an instance. Not sure who would federate with them.

[–] Ataraxia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] dill@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago

Most Based answer.

[–] Julian_1_2_3_4_5@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I have to say, i don't like it, i mean i got here, because i didn't want to have anything to do anymore with them, but i guess if we are careful enough, they probably can't do to much to destroy our current fediverse.

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Will be interesting.
More likely to be noticed by calckey,misskey/friendica users who are on platforms.more similar to Facebook. Probably noticed by Mastodon users.

Not sure if kbin/Lemmy users will notice. This is based on me not noticing posts from these servers on Mastodon, calckey etc

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

My feeling about Meta joining the Fediverse is: 🚨DANGER!🚨

[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

[–] ikiru@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I guess I'll just go back to reading books and watching movies full time.

Fuck all of those tech giants.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You could watch Foundation on Apple+...oh..

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It'll be near impossible for them to destroy the fediverse thankfully

[–] ataraxia937@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

I've been wondering about how that could work as a denial of service... Meta-scale would work, for sure

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ministar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People are being really hypocritical.

You want a free open source social network. But when people you dont like join it, you hate it. That is not how it works, its not how FREE in FOSS works.

Meta can join, they can do whatever they want. It literally the point of this social network. If you dont like it, then go to a social network that is not FOSS, but is heavily moderated, because that is what most of you really want.

[–] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

"Freedom" can be used to justify lots of really bad stuff. Meta has too much money to be trusted, they WILL fuck the Fediverse up eventually for more profit on the first chance they get (and people with lots of money always get those chances).

And it's not just about morality and the fucked up stuff that's happened on Meta, Iike the Cambridge Analytica scandal. I stopped using Facebook years ago because of the low quality of the content being posted there. And last week I logged back in to sell some stuff and oh boy, the content managed to get even worse.

I don't want growth just for the sake of growth. We don't need big corporations getting involved.

[–] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Stay the fuck away

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our's.

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go "Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$". Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg's gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

[–] Haily@rblind.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn’t know they’d joined. Do you have a source for this?

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

This is the only thing they couldn't already do. They've probably already been datamining Fediverse users. No need to set up an instance for that.

I agree with the v.meta.com and i.meta.com. We'll have to establish some good alternatives by then so people don't use them just because they work so well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I'd rather they weren't remotely near me at all

[–] axellenium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly my thoughts, I don’t trust meta or zucky’s leadership, their motives will always be profit over everything else

[–] HealGirl@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

[–] LostRedditor@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Bad. I just feel bad.

I think they would take advantage of Fediverse and destroy it.

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

A major company seeing the competitive advantage of joining the fediverse is a great development. I don't expect Meta to act in good faith, but it's an accomplishment nonetheless.

[–] qjkxbmwvz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

For myself, I'm not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word)


which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I'll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I'll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

† Sounds like this maybe isn't possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If Facebook behave and their instances have good moderation, they'll be successful. If they don't, they'll get defederated and turn into some niche twitter clone echo chamber like Truth Social.

Facebook is a company with great open-source tech contributions (React, GraphQL) but absolutely awful products (Literally every social media thing they've got their hands on), which is why they are desperately trying to turn their side project Oculus into their main product. And I think they, as the original "The Social Network" company, see the writing on the wall: that they either embrace federation and decentralization, or get swept away by it into the footnote of social media history.

Now, I don't think Facebook wants to JUST run an instance where they get to control everything. I think the most likely scenario is that Facebook will offer easy managed federated instance setup hosted on their own cloud servers for less tech inclined individuals and companies in the future, and they'll rebrand it as "the actual metaverse", which will finally end their tenure as an advertising company.

[–] ren@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Facebook et al has had a horrible track record of creating a new app/service and getting people on board. Their 3 successes are Facebook, Whatsapp (bought), and IG (bought). Every time they've launched an app outside of these, they failed (IGTV anyone?).

The Fediverse is open.

They can create Threads on activity pub and hope that they can create a server that competes with Twitter. Go for it, who cares. You can choose to follow people there or not, or join or not, or be on a server that defederates from it or not.

That's the beauty of it.

Meta's userbase is diverse. It has good and bad players. No need to broadstrokes it. If people join the Fediverse via Threads, many will discover Mastodon, Lemmy, Kbin, Calckey etc over time. Discovery & community!

So, like... in conclusion or whatever... everyone needs to chill. IMO.

[–] pinwurm@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Makes more sense for Meta to create their own "Metaverse" than join an open-source network.

Instagram and Facebook already communicate, it won't be too difficult to include WhatsApp into that mix.

If they buy something like Mastodon, it would make better business sense to cut it off from the Federation and sync it with Meta's products instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Meepster@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί