this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
38 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48520 readers
665 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

[–] Bjoern_Tantau@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

Yeah, I was thinking of Jabber as well, when I heard this. For a brief period everything was perfect. Facebook and Google were both using Jabber. And even WhatsApp was using it, I think. So if you had an account somewhere you could actually chat with all your friends, totally unimpeded.

EU should hurry up with their federation laws.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fratermus 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They are free to set up an instance. Not sure who would federate with them.

[–] dill@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

Most Based answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago

They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

This is the only thing they couldn't already do. They've probably already been datamining Fediverse users. No need to set up an instance for that.

I agree with the v.meta.com and i.meta.com. We'll have to establish some good alternatives by then so people don't use them just because they work so well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

My feeling about Meta joining the Fediverse is: 🚨DANGER!🚨

[–] Julian_1_2_3_4_5@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I have to say, i don't like it, i mean i got here, because i didn't want to have anything to do anymore with them, but i guess if we are careful enough, they probably can't do to much to destroy our current fediverse.

[–] qjkxbmwvz 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

For myself, I'm not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word)


which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I'll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I'll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

† Sounds like this maybe isn't possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

[–] IntlLawGnome@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I think @tchambers put it well on his Mastodon post: no need to preemptively block, but "stay vigilant with eyes wide open and a finger on the block button."

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ataraxia937@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

I've been wondering about how that could work as a denial of service... Meta-scale would work, for sure

[–] ikiru@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I guess I'll just go back to reading books and watching movies full time.

Fuck all of those tech giants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go "Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$". Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg's gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If Facebook behave and their instances have good moderation, they'll be successful. If they don't, they'll get defederated and turn into some niche twitter clone echo chamber like Truth Social.

Facebook is a company with great open-source tech contributions (React, GraphQL) but absolutely awful products (Literally every social media thing they've got their hands on), which is why they are desperately trying to turn their side project Oculus into their main product. And I think they, as the original "The Social Network" company, see the writing on the wall: that they either embrace federation and decentralization, or get swept away by it into the footnote of social media history.

Now, I don't think Facebook wants to JUST run an instance where they get to control everything. I think the most likely scenario is that Facebook will offer easy managed federated instance setup hosted on their own cloud servers for less tech inclined individuals and companies in the future, and they'll rebrand it as "the actual metaverse", which will finally end their tenure as an advertising company.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

To me it sounds like they are trying to Embrace, Extend, Extinguish the fediverse. I wouldn't doubt if at first they adopted it with all the standards then started doing proprietary crap

[–] Zuberi@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I say we just don't allow them on most kbin/lemmy instances. Let the people decide what info is bullshit or not.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Is that necessary though? I feel like we should let them join. If they do something malicious, then we can block them. IMO, it doesn't make sense to just preemptively block them for no real reason.

[–] TrinityTek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They've demontrated their evil nature in the past, promoting divisive and inciteful material and anything to drive engagement for the sake of advertiser dollars. I don't think we need to wait for them to do it again in the Fediverse. Better to head that shit off right up front.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. Microsoft did it before, we shouldn't let Meta do it now.

[–] Cynosure@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is wholly necessary. They will start massive data mining operations if they join, harming users of all instances.

[–] bric@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Data mining can happen without any of that, everything you post in the fediverse is literally available for anyone to see. Realistically, the most harm they can do is build controlled communities that grow so huge that they drown out all of the fediverse's open communities.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Look at what happened with Google Chrome and browser standards. We don't want a company that dominates the landscape changing the rules in their favour.

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Your most harm scenario is exactly what they want to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Harlan_Cloverseed@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Block them or I’m gone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Meepster@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

[–] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

It's an easy fix. If an instance you're a part of federates with them then just move to a new instance.

Hopefully this will put instance blocking on the top of the list.

[–] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They're trojan horse. We can't stop them from creating their own servers, but we can choose to defederate them. Up with the Anti-Meta Defederation Pact

[–] HealGirl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Will be interesting.
More likely to be noticed by calckey,misskey/friendica users who are on platforms.more similar to Facebook. Probably noticed by Mastodon users.

Not sure if kbin/Lemmy users will notice. This is based on me not noticing posts from these servers on Mastodon, calckey etc

[–] Bicyclejohn@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Give meta the boot

[–] Rolive@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Fuuuuuck no! This isn't actually happening right? This is just an idea I hope?

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

It's the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our's.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Haily@rblind.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn’t know they’d joined. Do you have a source for this?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish

[–] iie@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

for anyone not familiar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

"Embrace, extend, and extinguish" (EEE), also known as "embrace, extend, and exterminate", is a phrase that the U.S. Department of Justice found that was used internally by Microsoft to describe its strategy for entering product categories involving widely used standards, extending those standards with proprietary capabilities, and then using those differences in order to strongly disadvantage its competitors.

[–] Lor@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I'd reaaally rather not have that happen.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί