198
I'm disappointed that she's a federal judge - so I honestly don't give a shit what disappoints her.
She's a future Supreme if ever there was one. One bendy MAGA idiot to add to the growing collection.
What a wonderful compliment for Mr. Smith.
Is there anything to be disappointed in Jack Smith about? Maybe. But it pales in comparison to what we have to be disappointed in ~~Amy~~ Aileen Cannon about. The judge is the only disappointing story here.
It's hard to give a shit about anything a MAGA syncophant thinks or feels.
They are soulless creatures, it is hard to imagine them thinking or feeling.
Is there anything to be disappointed in Jack Smith about?
Yes, if you feel what he does threatens your darling's candidacy.
But for the rest of us, no.
I'm a bit disappointed in him for not trying to go above her for a mistrial yet. But I'm holding out hope that he won't just sit there and let her blatantly kill the case without even trying to hide it
Aileen* Cannon
Thanks, fixed. Not sure who the other person is.
Maybe you were thinking of Amy Coney Barrett?
I honestly don't know but that sounds like a good possibility 🙂
Lmfao - the guy looks like Coach and this judge looks incompetent all around, needing procedures and the impact of ignoring things explained to her.
I’ll take Coach over a clown.
this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
198 points (95.8% liked)
News
21850 readers
5111 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS