1517
Paying for advertising (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] best_username_ever@sh.itjust.works 128 points 2 months ago

But how can you show them that you bought an overpriced shirt made by a child in Bangladesh?

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago

Screenprint the notice right on the shirt: this shirt supports Bangladeshi child welfare

Kinda makes everyone else jerks if they’re buying clothes from makers who could afford their next meal regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 107 points 2 months ago

Trick yourself out until you look like a NASCAR

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait... Is that 2020s really what it looks like now?! Or is the meme just 5 years old?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I want a divorce

Because you look like a horse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] higgsboson@dubvee.org 90 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I always make car dealers take their own sticker or badge off of any vehicle I buy. I usually offer to keep the advertising in place, in exchange for a discount, but they never take me up on it.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

I make removal of any dealership branding a condition of purchase.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 months ago

Hell yeah, brandalism is already too pervasive and just kind of accepted. Good on you.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 30 points 2 months ago

Funny to see this, because I haven't bought a vehicle in a long time, but I had the EXACT same thought.

I grimace every time I see that hideous "CarMax - - -" decal stuck to the actual car body.

Same with license plate frames that are like "Huge 'Dicky' Richard's Auto Circus Emporium Honda Jeep Lexus - We rub you right!"

At least those just tell me "the driver is likely lazy or can't identify a screwdriver." But an actual decal? Yeah they better take it off, and discount me if they scratch it in the process. :p

Obnoxious, man.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 months ago
[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

"The Century of the Self" in a nutshell. 😬

[-] Addv4@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

The irony is that this is often true. I have always preferred shirts that have minimal advertising on them (preferably none, but a dime sized insignia is generally the best you get) but they are notably harder to find and when you do, they are more expensive. The happy medium I have found is looking for used Polo type shirts that were expensive when new, which I can generally find cheaply because collars aren't a popular look these days.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 12 points 2 months ago

You mean blank t-shirts? Because blank t-shirts are usually a lot cheaper than ones with a logo, and most other kinds of shirts I don't usually see logos on them but maybe we shop in different places. For t-shirts I used to get them from a screen printing vendor because I liked ha ING multiple different colored shirts and they were usually around like 2-3 dollars per shirt depending on the brand

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

My thoughts exactly. I stopped wearing conspicuously branded products when I was in highschool for this very reason.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's why I won't wear stuff like that

Now, there's the adjacent, but not the same thing of band shirts or similar merchandise. The difference is that in theory, the band/artist is going to benefit from the purchase. It is still advertising that I'm paying for, but, because merchandise is often a big income stream for musicians in particular, I don't object to being their billboard if I like them enough to get anything of theirs in the first place.

When it's a clothing company? Hell no. If their label/logo is more than the size of a tag, I'm not doing it. I don't mind the idea of a trademark/label/tag being present, that's expected. It's when the branding becomes the design that it's a problem.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'm fond of the "Tshirts that make a statement" thing.

It's personal expression to say "Hey I'm really into this band and I might've gone to this concert!" Could be a conversation starter too, and it supports the band or artist like you said!

But I really don't understand people walking around with some billboard from a clothing mega-brand. You're literally paying them to do marketing work for them lol.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wish this was a thing... All the shirts I've gotten in the last few years have been $40-50 and have the brand's logo on the back near the neckline (they also came with stickers that are advertising the brand). I would usually only spend $5-10 for a shirt, but these are limited prints and most of them are on really good, comfortable shirts. Just look how cool my newest one is:

[-] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

If I drop fifty bucks on a t-shirt it better come with a bag of weed.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 15 points 2 months ago

Initially that was the only way you could buy weed in Maine from a delivery service before they allowed recreational dispensaries. $50 T-shirt with a free bag of weed.

[-] jonasw@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago

Sir, I think there is some t-shirt in your hair

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I have two dogs and one is very cuddly. Those are my black shirts within 30 seconds of putting them on. And most of my shirts are black.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Every so often, I am willing to pay to advertise.

I just bought a shirt with a vintage PBS logo from the 1980s, which I did not buy from PBS since they aren't selling it, but I would have paid to advertise PBS from a PBS store if they sold it with the 1980s logo.

So yeah, I pay to advertise public television- and public radio, since I really need an NPR shirt as well. We also give them money every year. And we get back really excellent journalism, so it's worth it.

Now Nike? Fuck Nike. I'd never wear their fucking swoosh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Moorshou@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 months ago

Look if I'm gonna wear brand stuff its gonna be linux

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Linus should be paying you for the advertising!

10% off your next Linux purchase.

[-] Moorshou@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

I think they paid me by letting me use their OS for free. Also, why not talk about something I love to use?

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

why not talk about something I love

Because capitalism! Nothing has meaning unless you get a monetary value out of it!

I only write this comment because it will get me more only fans subscribers in the long run and one day I can upgrade to selling turbines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago

The bougie love advertising for free! You know how many yeti stickers I see on cars? It’s a fucking ice chest…

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Those Apple stickers. This was in the Bay Area but not that many people work at Apple. Even if they did, who would advertise their employer on their car??

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] ghostblackout@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

No no you should get paid to wear them

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Conspicuous consumption

In sociology and in economics, the term conspicuous consumption describes and explains the consumer practice of buying and using goods of a higher quality, price, or in greater quantity than practical. In 1899, the sociologist Thorstein Veblen coined the term conspicuous consumption to explain the spending of money on and the acquiring of luxury commodities (goods and services) specifically as a public display of economic power—the income and the accumulated wealth—of the buyer. To the conspicuous consumer, the public display of discretionary income is an economic means of either attaining or of maintaining a given social status.

This results in what may be known as Veblen goods, for which the demand increases as the price increases, in apparent contradiction of the law of demand, resulting in an upward-sloping demand curve.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The entire principle Apple is based on

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

I even take the badges off my car. Nobody needs to know what brand I have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zacryon@lemmy.wtf 13 points 2 months ago

Adidas products are also produced really cheap due to child labour. So that's another reason to make those cheaper for customers.

https://www.presseportal.de/pm/58468/5504476 (German)

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Spoiler alert, most stuff in the fashion industry is chocked full of human rights violations.

Climate Town on Shirts: https://youtu.be/8CkgCYPe68Q

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

But if I stop buying them, won't I be putting hundreds of children out of work?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I admit I buy T-shirts at micro-breweries. I do support those that I actually buy. Additionally, it helps me keep record of my journey of visiting many breweries.

I've even turned some of my collection into a king sized quilt and a lap quilt. So, my shirts are very useful in more ways than one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Juice64@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I used to say this a cynical teen lol I still believe it, just don’t care to talk about it anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 10 points 2 months ago

ironically technically not true

one principle of marketing is the knowledge that the brand actually adds (perceived) value for many consumers, and so they are willing to pay more

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

It's true that this is how most consumers act. It's dumb, but iirc it's factually correct.

If you take a brand name shirt, remove the logo in a way that is visually perfect, and sell them side-by-side, then the logo shirt will outsell the non-logo shirt. Or so I've heard.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 months ago

Absolutely. There are definitely people like OP who prefer products without branding, but for the majority (average) of consumers in many markets, the branding actually adds value.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kylua@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

that's why I don't like buying t-shirt with brand logos on, I feel like companies are using me as means to reach out to new customers

[-] Skkorm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I go pretty far to my way to make sure my branded t-shirts are from small to mid-sized online content creators that I enjoy. It works out because they usually put a lot of effort into making sure their stuff is unique

[-] lengau@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

Almost all of my branded shirts were free. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hactar42@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

This is true to a point. Once you go past brands Ralph Lauren, Gucci, or Versace to the "real" expensive brands, they become understated again. For example, this $555 blue T-shirt

[-] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

For that price, a tailor better come to my home, get my exact measurements, and make it specifically for me from high quality materials.

[-] neo@lemy.lol 7 points 2 months ago

And that is why, with our new triangle shaped business model, you and your customers are getting paid for wearing our shirts!

That's right! The more shirts you buy, the more you are getting paid! Just grap a couple of friends and get rich together!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
1517 points (99.2% liked)

memes

9280 readers
2248 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS