"Finance company owner purchases second home to get away from family"
There is the updated title. Not just a mother, a mother that owns their own company and wants to get away from family obligations. Do what you have to do to find peace, but this title does not express what is actually happening.
Mother seems more relevant when getting away from the family is what the article is all about. It's quite neutral headline as they should be instead of loaded ones like the one you seem to be suggesting with the underlying anti-rich/-capitalist spin.
yeah, leave the rich alone, they might get their feelings hurt. :'c
Journalism should strive to be unbiased.
How can journalism be unbiased when the world is inequal.
They can't, they're flawed just like the rest of us. But they should strive to be unbiased.
Imagine if everyone could just buy a first permanent shelter.
To like, start a family in the first place.
Well the best move would be to stop having kids, as we live in an economic and ecological disaster.
Well the best move would be to prevent ecological and economic disaster 50 years ago when we knew it was gonna happen and why.
No, that's in the past and no one can change that.
You can change where the gurt go, and what the gurt do, right now
Oh, we meant a current course of action by the affected and powerless, yeah, give up all dreams and rights and watch it burn I guess
I suggested a current course of action for the affected, which provides them immediate and lasting power over their futures.
We are currently already watching it burn, and kids only speed that along.
Possessing property is not a right, unfortunately.
You are powerless insomuch as you position yourself to be overpowered by the world and the country you live in. Staying powerful comes from staying flexible.
Pursuit of happiness
I like you, we need more of this energy
Reminds me of all of those “I paid off my student loans by the time I graduated” (by just having rich parents and living with them and spending their money
And every other parent who can't afford a home, let alone a second just because one, is seething.
Poor rich people.
Why is this news
"rich person does rich person shit"
Where I'm from, a $69K flat is a pipe dream.
That's a mood if I've ever seen one.
Better described by a tax bracket than a mood.
Where's a 69k flat?
Why can't she just pay a live in nanny to deal with her kids. Like all the other rich bitches do when they can't be bothered to relate to their kids.
My mom didn't take a day off for 25 fucking years. When I became an adult and realized how much work to just be an adult with no responsibilities.... I have no idea how she did three kids as a single mom. Between work, cooking, cleaning, making us do our homework and everything else. I really wonder if she ever got a full night of sleep.
And this rich bitch buys an entire extra flat. Fuck this.
Imagine if your mom could have had some time and space for herself instead of working constantly and never getting a full nights sleep. What a bitch she would have been.
Fuck you. You clearly did get the point and have raised 3 kids by yourself . My mom could not have the space, because we had no money and my dad wasn't a thing. Maybe if there was more equity she could have. Instead the money is being collected at the top. So the wealthy don't have to be inconvenienced by life.
Oh and don't fuck call my mom a bitch. Go fuck of.
What a bish
Never go full Karen.
Some would call that abandonment
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.