78
submitted 6 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 49 points 6 months ago

How fast do they think internet connections are? If the higher quality assets were that big compared to the 300 GB install no way they're going to finish loading or fit in the memory while you're playing the game

[-] subignition@fedia.io 11 points 6 months ago

Separately, I wonder how significant the extra bandwidth costs will be on the overall expenses of running the service

[-] testman@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago

Will it have any fallback systems so that it remains playable even when servers go down?
if not, it is another candidate for stopkillinggames.com

[-] BellaDonna@mujico.org 16 points 6 months ago

They're inventing a technical reason to require online to make the game functional. This is insane.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 9 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure basically all PC games in the last 20 years are candidates, it's just a matter of time. I was surprised how many big titles from the mid 2000s are no longer playable, and you know DRM hasn't gotten less dependent on remote servers since then.

It's really the only argument for buying physical console games, but even then you're rarely intended to play the version of the game that ships on the disk/cart.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 6 months ago

so, you have gigabytesper second of disk io, and the game relies on the couple of megaBITS of internet bandwidth most people have to stream textures? As opposed to downloading and installing them once as an update...

This does not pass the smell test.

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

You couldn't have said it any better. This doesn't make a single bit of sense and something is truly fucky here

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

So this means it doesn’t take up much disk space right?

Xbox's store page for the game reveals Call of Duty: Black Ops 6's install size is an eye-watering 309.85 GB.

Wtf?

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

If they add any patches, then Series S owners won’t be able to install it at all, much less own any other games.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 23 points 6 months ago

How much bandwidth will this use per hour of play? This sounds like a data cap destroyer.

[-] TeddyKila@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago

enshittification marches on.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Bullshit words to feed us 100% live service crap.

[-] nucleative@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Hell to the no.

[-] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

In the past there were games where you were given the option to install an optional HD texture pack. Can they simply do this here, too? Yes, they can. But no, gotta waste bandwidth..

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

It'd be really funny if it's only streaming the texture for like a small bush and this is just a shitty justification

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
78 points (98.8% liked)

Gaming

20180 readers
42 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS