517
submitted 1 week ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

These asshats are unhinged and un-American.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 125 points 1 week ago

For fucks sake, I’m so tired of this shit

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher 90 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every election is the most important election of our lifetimes, since the right keeps becoming more fascist. No shit, it's exhausting.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

In the most recent 538 poll, Robinson is up by 4 points, and this was taken before the debate, which means the gap may’ve widened.

If you’re in NC, or have family/friends there, please tell them to vote and not for this loon

[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 23 points 1 week ago

Vive la révolution.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 69 points 1 week ago

As a leftist I'm about done listening to constant bloody threats from MAGA people.

If MAGA are going to say "If leftist don't get in the way there will be no blood" then I'm here to say that there will be blood.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

I’d love to confront an otherwise normal, conventionally Republican voter who is planning to vote for this shit. I’m sure some of my coworkers or neighbors or acquaintances fall into this category. However, I see no outward projection about their support of this garbage. I assume that they must be ashamed to advertise what garbage views they have or at the very least have no confidence that they could defend such positions when confronted. Again, I’m just assuming their presence in my immediate social vicinity given all the polling. I of course can see the nut job on the corner with adrenachrome signs, but that asshole isn’t representative of most Republicans. Fucking cowards, the lot of them. Ignorant, self-hating cowards.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

"I just agree with their fiscal policies and think abortion is murder, I don't like the other stuff, but most of it's just harmless (to me.)"

[-] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago
  • Oh, there's no way he said it
  • Ok, I guess he did but it's taken out of context
  • Looks like it's not taken out of context but it was one time when they got excited
  • Ok, there's a history of this kind of rhetoric
  • Well, no one really believes that stuff
  • Ok, this really is a popular opinion
  • I just want lower taxes
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

but most of it's just harmless (to me.) ... for now.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 42 points 1 week ago

Projection is a hell of a drug.

[-] ericatty@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago

Ugh, saw the headline and knew it was my state. Our current Dem Gov is term limited. This Robinson asshat is so very embarrassing and scary like a drunk bear with brain damage.

NC is so gerrymandered we are painted red, but I think Gov is based on popular vote so there is still some hope for Stein for next Gov and Jackson for next AG.

Also, Cotham can suck it for getting voted in as a Democrat then switching parties within months in a very very blue district. She ran on protecting abortion rights then voted to ban it after joining the Republican party.

We are potentially very very up a nasty creek without paddles here, even in the blue places.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 28 points 1 week ago

Also, Cotham can suck it for getting voted in as a Democrat then switching parties within months in a very very blue district. She ran on protecting abortion rights then voted to ban it after joining the Republican party.

Scumbag move. This kind of behavior needs consequences.

[-] ericatty@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, multiple lawyers said there are no legal consequences, so next election is all there is.

Her mother, Pat, has been easily re-elected (Dem) for years. Pat supported the decision made by her daughter. Pat normally wins easily. She came in 4th in the primary.

https://www.wfae.org/politics/2024-03-05/longtime-incumbent-pat-cotham-trails-in-mecklenburg-county-commissioners-primary

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

They should have to post the Ten Commandments in that church

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

I agree.

Species would be far better off without people like him in it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Someone needs to take him aside and politely explain that calling for violence is not going to work out the way he thinks it will work out.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It might work out the way he things it will though - namely with him being elected. Doubt he cares beyond that.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Neat, let's do a comparison. Does anyone have a list of Homosexual pedophiles, religious pedophiles, and politician pedophiles? I am super curious how INCONCEIVABLY different those graphs are. I couldn't even venture a guess on what the outcome could even look like! /s

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
517 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18114 readers
3649 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS