446
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 208 points 1 month ago

Company’s project is not your project. Don’t get too attached.

[-] kureta@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago

Words of wisdom.

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 month ago

This guy is me. Fuck your job. Take all you can, give nothing back.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

So... How are things at work?

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago

Super relaxed, that comes with the territory of not giving a fuck. Also I make good money.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Lol, "fire me if you dare, then it's your problem"

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

💯

#I'm going to talk to HR! I'm going to have you fired!

Me:

[-] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of the KSP2 fiasco. Management insisting on reusing the engine from the old game, and firing all the senior devs who could have told them there was no possibility of getting the features they'd announced to work without rewriting the engine from scratch.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 49 points 1 month ago

It's so sad what happened with KSP2, we were all so excited at the start. I'm glad I didn't buy it though

[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 month ago

It can't be repeated enough: never pre-order a game

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

I bought it, learned that there was no career mode and no plan to add one, and refunded it

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

you ... liked career mode in ksp1? respect lmao

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

Do people not? I love the challenge of designing efficient craft that can complete multiple missions at once!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 28 points 1 month ago

They also wouldn't allow the new devs to talk to the old devs, so they had to figure out the old codebase for themselves.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My previous work used two mission-critical software for continuous operation.

One was some guy's university project written in Object Pascal and PHP and largely untouched since 2006. I tried offering fixes (I also knew Pascal), but I was rejected every time because the cumulative downtime caused by software issues was not enough to justify the downtime caused by the update (obviously this was determined by a Middle Manager (derogatory)).

The other was (I shit you not) an Excel spreadsheet with 15000 lines and 500 columns. I tried making a copy and cleaning it up, but Excel couldn't handle the amount of data and ran out of memory.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 month ago

I absolutely cannot stand this kind of logic.

"We make a shit ton of money on this very critical piece of software!"

"Then let me fix it!"

"NO! It's making us money NOW! It only stops making us money when it's broken. At which point then we fix it."

"But that might be hours. We can minimize downtime if we plan properly."

"But it's making us money NOW!1!1!”

I shit you not I have had various versions of this conversation throughout my career, across industries, across disciplines.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

True zen is achieved when you realize it's not your problem. Even better when the thing eventually breaks and you can be smug about it.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

I'm not in the industry anymore, but every time I raised an issue to the boss that got ignored, I used to like to keep a little folder where I'd print the emails or just take notes about the issue, the proposed fix, and when and why it got rejected.

Then, 8 months later when everything is on fire, I could point at the date February 12, where at 3:40 PM I raised this specific issue that got ignored.

It never benefitted me, not once, in fact I sincerely think my boss at the time thought I was a smug little prick. Which was fair, I was one. But credit where it's due, every time I brought the folder back out, he'd get a look like he just swallowed a mug full of cold piss and tell me I was right. That's all I really wanted out of that folder anyway.

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

a smug little prick

lmao

a mug full of cold piss

worth it

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

It's your problem when they can't make payroll because of it. And it's your problem when they ultimately blame you for not having the solution ready to implement.

The first has happened to me once.

The second more times than I can count.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
  1. Make PR ready to merge.
  2. Mark as Draft and write in the description that management says this should not be merged until the site breaks.
  3. Site breaks.
  4. They blame you for not having a solution ready.
  5. 😎 👈 You.
[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

And while you're busy making this PR to fix a problem that you haven't been authorized on, you're falling behind on current tickets.

The only way to realistically make this happen at most companies is if you're doing work for your company on off time, and, generally speaking, never ever do that for any reason unless you're being paid for on-call.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

This is not how the real world works

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Even better when the thing eventually breaks

You mean when it finally does become your problem?

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If it's going to be your problem no matter what, start making offline backups of your email account, and print out the email conversation where the bossmang rejected the fix. Make sure your HR rep is present on every meeting, ~~even~~ especially if it makes the people uncomfortable.

(this assumes that you live in a place where employee protection laws exist, i.e. it might not work in America)

[-] SigmarStern@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, I remember the good ol' "Our whole business Logic is within this 30 tables spread sheet, that only one person can read, and don't you dare restarting that computer" times.

One person. Sitting in front of three monitors. In front of a spreadsheet that maxed out every resource of that computer. It was glorious.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

don’t you dare restarting that computer

We had two desktop PCs on the factory floor doing server stuff for a lot of assembly machines. We couldn't move them to proper hardware or virtualize them because the GUI and the server were built as one monolithic application (I still don't trust any Japanese company's developers as a result), so one computer was made the primary server for one half of the factory and the fallback for the other half, and vice versa, to solve the reliability issues stemming from the software's dogshit design.

What it couldn't solve was Windows' dogshit design. One early Monday morning, when we switched on the factory, Windows decided to force-update itself, then failed and bricked both computers. We spent half the shift with our thumbs up our asses periodically checking if tech support bothered to show up yet.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago

I have a lot of questions for whoever set that up in the first place, first and foremost of which is: why in the everlasting fuck was that computer ever attached to the internet? At most it should be allowed internal network access only.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Some required network services were located off-site. It could've been done in a secure way, but don't expect such considerations from the company described above. It's still better than the many XP and Win2000 production machines with the same internet access.

I can't say a lot because of confidentiality, but if you had seen the factory around the time I quit, having a Win10 computer with internet access would've been the least of your concerns. If we had OSHA here, that building would've kept them busy for a week.

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It sounds glorious!

[-] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 month ago

Back then when I used to have elitist techbro brain-rot, I used to feel the same. Now that I've become very pro-labor, I think that this guy is based.

[-] beejjorgensen 32 points 1 month ago

"Every dependency is an asset. Every dependency is a liability."

[-] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Sums up every Node project I've had the displeasure of looking at. The lock file being the only thing holding the twisted web of versions keeping that franken-app running between a minefield of incompatibilities and buggy hacks.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 12 points 1 month ago
[-] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

ffs, every time someone from a community group asks me "Can you have a quick look at our basic website, we just need to change ", and I'm like "sure, i used to do web development, let's have a look [...] FFFFFFUUUUUC...."

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Dude, I'm so bad at arguing in zoom so the guys that push for that shit get their way. Fml.

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Have you considered you're just bad at arguing in general and it's not the medium?

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 7 points 1 month ago

Difficult to punch coworkers in their face in zoom

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Take the passive-aggressive nerd approach:

  1. Start a niche online movement that only cares about one aspect of computing and convinces people all their problems are caused by your pet peeve

  2. let the company dig its grave

  3. create a FOSS alternative

  4. sell a premium version for businesses (it includes phone support and management-friendly marketing matetials)

  5. congrats, you are now the de facto standard software in your field

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

I have a coworker who thinks I'm this guy cuz it's apparently absurd for us to add the 5 most popular dependencies on the planet to our environment and I'm sentencing us to the doom of dependency hell.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago
[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yes, most of my jobs have had people who take vacation.

[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oh I hate that

[-] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

So you use SharePoint as well? Hahaha

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Well of course I know him, he is me... I haven't found a job yet but this post pretty much sums a lot my personal projects.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
446 points (95.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

31687 readers
28 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS