403
submitted 1 week ago by logos@sh.itjust.works to c/news@lemmy.world

The Trump campaign attempted to distance itself from the conservative Project 2025 playbook on Friday. Despite significant overlap between Project 2025 personnel and staffers from former president Donald Trump’s administration and campaign, Trump issued a statement saying he had “no idea who is behind” the project. 

Project 2025 is spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation in partnership with dozens of rightwing advocacy organizations. It has two main components: First, a 900-page manifesto with a wish list for the first 180 days of the “next conservative administration,” including to further restrict abortion access and “dismantle the administrative state.” The second component is an application-only recruitment effort to ensure the administration is quickly staffed with loyalists.  

On Friday, Trump disavowed Project 2025 in a post to Truth Social, his social media platform, saying he found unspecified parts of the project “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.” 

“I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal,” Trump wrote. “Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

Trump’s vague disavowal of Project 2025 came a few days after Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, made inflammatory statements about a coming “second American Revolution” that would be “bloodless” “if the left allows it to be.”

“As we’ve been saying for more than two years now, Project 2025 does not speak for any candidate or campaign,” the Project 2025 account said in a statement on X. “But it is ultimately up to that president, who we believe will be President Trump, to decide which recommendations to implement.”

Despite Trump’s claims to have “nothing to do with” Project 2025, his administration and campaign personnel contributed to the project, including Karoline Leavitt, his campaign’s national press secretary, as the Biden campaign quickly pointed out on X. 

Former Trump administration officials wrote and edited massive chunks of the manifesto. One of its two primary editors, Paul Dans, who directs the Heritage Foundation’s 2025 Presidential Transition Project, served as the White House liaison for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management during the Trump administration, among other positions. 

Rick Dearborn, who was briefly Trump’s deputy chief of staff, wrote the White House chapter. Russ Vought, Trump’s director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote the chapter on OMB and similar executive offices. 

Gene Hamilton, who served in the Trump Justice Department and is now the vice president and general counsel of America First Legal, wrote the DOJ chapter. Similarly, the chapter on the Department of Homeland Security was written by Ken Cuccinelli, who held multiple positions in Trump’s DHS. The list of Project 2025 playbook contributors includes former Trump administration officials from the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, among other departments and agencies. 

Peter Navarro — who advised Trump’s 2016 campaign, served as director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy, and recently reported to prison for refusing to cooperate with a Congressional inquiry into January 6 insurrection — drafted a chapter on trade policy.

People close to Trump also contributed to the Project 2025’s effort to recruit conservatives for administration positions, including appearances in promos and training videos. 

Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, is featured in a promotional video for the Project 2025 academy, along with Stephen Miller and other former Trump administration officials. According to the Project 2025 recruitment website, “The Presidential Administration Academy is a one-of-a-kind educational and skill-building program designed to prepare and equip future political appointees now to be ready on Day One of the next conservative Administration.”

According to the academy syllabus, Leavitt also co-teaches a video module in the academy, titled, “The Art of Professionalism.” 

“I appeared in a video for Heritage the year before I started working on the Trump campaign,” Leavitt told The Intercept when asked how the Trump campaign could claim ignorance of Project 2025. Referring to Trump’s campaign platform, she said: “Agenda 47 is the only official policy agenda of the President Trump and our campaign.”

Other former Trump administration officials listed on the Project 2025 academy syllabus include Dearborn, Roger Severino, Hugh Fike, and Bethany Kozma. 

The post Trump’s Camp Says It Has Nothing to Do With Project 2025 Manifesto — Aside From Writing It appeared first on The Intercept.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 106 points 1 week ago

"What do you say to the Proud Boys?"

  • "I don't know them, but stand back and stand by"

"What do you say about Project 2025?"

  • "I don't know them, but I wish them well"

Cool. Cool cool cool.

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 60 points 1 week ago

So... the candidate who has repeatedly publicly stated that if elected he fully intends to be a dictator claims to have nothing to do with a roadmap to dictatorship written by his ex-staffers...

Riiight.

This is another of the things that astonishes me about Trump - not only is he a grotesque buffoon in clown makeup and a ludicrous combover who notoriously smells like ass and a staggeringly delusional lunatic who clearly lives in some sort of fantasy world - he's a transparent, egregious and laughably poor compulsive liar. He can barely complete a sentence without lying (well - he can barely complete a sentence at all, but you know what I mean).

I swear that if he was magically transferred directly into a movie script, the character would be rejected as too over-the-top to be believable. And yet here we are...

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

He's basically Biff from Back 2 The Future 2

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Fun fact Biff in that movie was based on Trump

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

As is Clamp in Gremlins 2.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And Chunk in Goonies

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

If Trump is talking, it's a lie. At least he's consistent in that regard.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

He wasn't lying when he said he finds his daughter attractive.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Every so often, something he believes is so absolutely atrocious that even he can't bring himself to lie about it.

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That they wrote it, or that they didn't?

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Oh, they wrote it. They damned well wrote it. Now they deny it, and those are the lies I'm accusing them for.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Sounds like the orange shit stains memory and mental faculties are failing fast if he can’t remember stuff his campaign has been pushing for the last few months.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump is somehow always sounded by white nationalist and racists but somehow has nothing to do with them, and he doesn't know them lol. The mind of a average Trump supporter is deranged af.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

That's also how it goes for some of the violent attacks. They drive people mad with dogma, but when one does snap they claim they couldn't have known.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
403 points (98.6% liked)

News

21850 readers
5111 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS