147
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Video of the speech here, he really did hit it out of the park:

(Biden at the 1 hour, 31 minute mark, 1 hour, 38 minutes for Biden at the microphone)

https://www.youtube.com/live/FKc8c_23lSI

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 48 points 1 month ago

He's pissed.

Pissed Joe is the best Joe. After listening to Michael Steele on the way home tonight, I'm optimistic about Joe's chances now.

After the debate performance and the various gaffs he always makes, he's statistically tied. If he keeps hammering Project 2025, the corrupt courts, and what the Trump presidency will do, he can pull this off. He has to keep this up through both debates and do alright through those.

Roll up those sleeves, gird those loins, and educate just what project 2025 will do!

[-] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 month ago

Something I frequently see missing from discussions on Project 2025 is the criminalization of trans people, very clearly calling for their murder. It labels trans people as pornography, pornography as child abuse, and calls for the death penalty for child abusers.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Thank you, I've been raising this alarm for at least two years since Florida came up with this combo wombo. No one believes me.

This is why I'm looking at my options for exit strategies right now. I know I'll be among the first sent to the camps.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

He has to keep this up through both debates and do alright through those.

there's more than one more?

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Vice presidential is one to watch.

If Harris eats whatever sludge he throws up there alive, shows that she's presidential material, and hammers project 2025. Just talk about that and that alone. That one thing and one thing alone will win this.

It's has:

Abandonment of veterans

Subjugation of women

A gigantic expansion of the government via the border patrol and religion

Purposeful weakening of the US dollar

Gigantic gift again to the 1%

Abandonment of our kids via abolishing Dept of Education and feeding them (a huge portion of the population actually depends on this meal especially in red states)

It ticks every goddamn box imaginable lol.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

When you start checking those page numbers (if this is the same version that's been circulating) you may find that they don't line up to those plans.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

Why hasn't trump responded to this yet? It's like he's hiding somewhere. I'm seeing more and more Republicans refusing to endorse trump, or actively voting against him:

https://lemmy.world/post/17502127

I just don't see how he can make it to the election. Eventually he's going to have to drop out so Republicans can nominate someone else.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The speech just ended a little bit ago, I'm sure it will be on Truth Social tonight.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

I think he's slowing down. People have been saying that more and more recently.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

I've been seeing your posts all day and I'm loving them. That's all. Have a great day!

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

I've been hearing that more and more recently too.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I don't like Trump either, buddy.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't know that any amount of homeruns will help at this point. The barn door is open, the horses have bolted. A significant minority of his party has openly called for him to step down, and one of the most influential members all but asked him to drop out in a public statement. That's going to be a millstone around his neck going forward.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It will be, but if he can hold it together for one more month, then have a stellar performance at the convention, it will go a long way.

[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

That man is supposed to hold the office for 4 more years, not one more month.

Dems were so fucking arrogant in 2016, they are doing the same thing again. They can't read the room 😕

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The contingencies for a President dying in office are rigorously tested by time. A fascist takeover the likes of this has never happened in America. I'll take electing someone who might not make it the four years, or really whoever isn't the guy trying to turn this place into a christian version of the Taliban's Afghanistan.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Yes obviously even a dead guy is better than a fascist but the problem is getting the corpse back in the office.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

No, the problem is preventing the fascist from getting into the office. Fuck the corpse, we'll Weekend at Bernie's it if we have to. Let's bring the focus back to the fascists. All this talk about replacement is just a blatant diversion from that.

[-] DarkDarkHouse 7 points 1 month ago

“Live Biden > Dead Biden > Dead Trump > Live Trump”

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
147 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS