225
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 205 points 1 month ago

This:

“When you feed a baby, Bobby, a vaccination, there’s like 38 different vaccines. And it looks like it’s meant for a horse, not a, you know, 10 pound or 20 pound baby,” Trump said to Kennedy, echoing a claim he’s made in the past. “And then you see the baby all of a sudden starting to change radically—I’ve seen it too many times. And then you hear that it doesn’t have an impact.”

Really puts this:

Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.

Into the right perspective.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 105 points 1 month ago

“20 pound baby”

He really is just fucking stupid.

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 82 points 1 month ago
[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I mean he has to pick from the few numbers that he knows...

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah he's always been a god damned braindead moron. He never finished grade school because his father paid for him to pass. If he wasn't born into wealth, that his father got from also being a piece of shit just like his shitty son, he'd be homeless or working as a Walmart greeter because he is too dumb to do anything else.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago

And his cult eats this shit up. How dumb are you to support a clown like that. It's sad.

[-] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Well obviously all you lightweights were just stunted by vaccines, REAL babies come out of the womb with all their teeth and a craving for beef jerky

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There was a wrong perspective?!?

[-] kralk@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

He's trying to convince Kennedy to drop out, he's not sharing his actual views

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago

So the son, Bobby, who leaked the video, did so because he was upset that Trump and Vance are not antivax enough for him?

I'm confused by the motive

[-] whyalone@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago

Trump knows that rfk is eating his qanon base and wants rfk to concede in order to get those votes, in return if Trump wins, will probably appoint rfk to a high position in his cabinet. That's all folks.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

He'll be the head of the CDC

[-] whyalone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that tweet definitely makes it seem like Tré is an idiot too.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 1 month ago
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

That's been RFK's whole campaign. He's a dilettante playing around, not someone actually trying to do politics.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh boy, I mean I'm glad the kid leaked it but what I shit kid and shit reasons he had.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

maybe Bobby Kennedy III should run for president

Two parties, indivisible, under Pfizer, with liberty and justice for sum.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
225 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4466 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS