157

Australian surfer Kai McKenzie's leg washes up after shark attack (www.bbc.com)

submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The severed leg of a surfer who was attacked by a shark has washed up on an Australian beach, with doctors now racing to see if it can be reattached.

Kai McKenzie, 23, was surfing near Port Macquarie in New South Wales (NSW) on Tuesday, when a 3m (9.8ft) great white shark bit him.

He managed to catch a wave into shore, where an off-duty police officer used a makeshift tourniquet to stem his bleeding, according to authorities.

His leg washed up a short time later and was put on ice by locals before being taken to hospital, where a medical team is now assessing surgery options.

top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 month ago

shark didn't even eat it... talk about insult to injury

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

I once heard a shark expert say that most of the time when sharks bite humans, it's not because they want to eat them, it's because that's kind of how they sense the world. Sort of "hmm... wonder what this tastes like? *CHOMP* Nope. Not shark food." I'm guessing that even applies when the leg is bitten completely off.

[-] mecfs@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Yep. Most attacks by great whites are shark “children” just learning about food trying different stuff.

[-] Iceman@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

Aw, that’s so cute.

[-] tomten@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Yeah sharks don't like the taste of people but they generally have poor eyesight so they mistake surfers etc splashing on the surface for food or as you say just curious.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

So they're sea puppies

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They don't. Our silhouettes get mistaken for seals or something fatty and delicious underneath, but the bite is just fibreglass, bit of meat, and immediately bone. There's a few sharks in Australia that will keep going—like the bulls and nurses—but sharks like the great white will deliver a devistating "curiosity" bite and that's usually it. Usually they are not near beaches, but will be there to chase food in the area in desperate times, especially around headlands or spits.

In surf lifesaving training as a teen, we were taught to get off the board, showing true form, and blow bubbles to disorientate, curing any curisoty. To my knowledge, that's never failed, but it's not like anyone's keeping record. In the situation if there's no wave to take in, it's the best known option to reducing chances of being bit.

I'd like to say how rare it is for that species (deep sea) and that size to be that close to a shore, let alone to attack 1 of tens of thousands that surf in Australia daily; but idiots will still call for a shark cull so they don't have to worry about their toddlers splashing in ankle deep water.

Last time it happened a few years ago, the surfer that got attacked condemned the culling, because surfers know rhat they're 50–150m out in the middle of other animals homes. Well past where all the breaking/rolling waves take action, which sharks don't go into—not even dolphins, really. Obviously it will happen to a very unlucky person every now and again. People that far out from the shore respect the ocean and everything within very much.

Sharks are cool and respected.

Edit: saltesc = saltwater escape. Grown up in Australian ocean.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Possibly tourist “shark watch” charters chumming up the shallow water? This is the theory many locals have for the increased incidence of shark attacks in Hawaii.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

None of the shark tours I'm aware of operate in shallow water. Anywhere that's good for surfing is terrible for hanging around in a cage and the sharks are much more reliable in deep water.

And if they were chumming in shallow waters they'd be pretty easily caught. If they're close enough for chumming to influence the sharks around surfers they're very visible from shore.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago

The keen surfer had only recently returned to the water after suffering a significant neck injury which forced him to take time off from the sport...

Well...shit.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Bro can’t take a hint

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 13 points 1 month ago

A new leg end is born.

[-] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Bit of an emotional rollercoaster for the poor guy.

Shark attack.

But I escape.

But my leg is now missing.

But hey my leg just washed up.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Science... because it was in cold briny water scientists are able to stitch it back! Maybe one day! Like you take the leg, put it in a special jelly, flow some artificial blood into it for 3 months and magically the leg is ready to stitch back onto the body.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

And now the stress of waiting to know if it salvageable

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024

157 points (97.6% liked)

World News

38492 readers

2788 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.