572
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 141 points 3 months ago

I think this is as strong as could reasonably be expected from Harris. It’s also brilliant politically. People who wouldn’t have voted for Biden because of Palestine may be willing to go with Harris.

In addition to age, this makes two of Biden’s biggest drawbacks crushed in one week. I like it.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

I'm feeling... dare i say... enfranchised?

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 months ago

Yeah same…like there can’t possibly be so much good news at once. I’m not used to this feeling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago
[-] Hazzia@infosec.pub 10 points 3 months ago

Do we get to open a chain of ourselves across the nation now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 months ago

Dems actually executed a plan shockingly well. Get the Republican anti-Biden propaganda machine to load up on specific issues, then swap Biden with someone that doesn’t have those issues. Now that the populace has been agitated on those issues, point out that Trump is the candidate who is old and fucks with Palestine. Classic bait and switch. Trump fell for the trap.

Kamala isn’t perfect, but she seems to be running on prosecuting and cleaning up the Trump crime spree. I can get behind that. A relief to see the dems pull something like this off. Acting like they were completely blowing it was just so believable. Biden’s debate performance really sold it.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 months ago

I am at least 90% sure it wasn't an act. They actually were just blowing it. You have to recognize Biden is the head of the party currently, even still as Harris is taking over. He spent his entire life gaining power. He didn't want to give it up. He just had enough people around him tell him he wasn't going to keep power no matter what and was just going to fuck over the party that he eventually listened. This wasn't some genius play by the Democrats, rather just the Republicans fucking up in their strategy assuming Biden was the only possible opponent.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

He spent his entire life gaining power. He didn’t want to give it up.

I've always been mystified by people that old wanting to cling to power. I'm a generation younger than Biden and I mainly just want a nap.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

It makes me ponder how mentally ill I would have to be to be a rich 80-year old healthy enough to get around and do things with my grand kids, and not just have a job but dedicate my entire fucking life to it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago

I’m not even sure the debate was a performance. I thought they really were completely blowing it, but just recovered incredibly well. I never even considered your idea of an unusually organized Democratic Party! Organization is not something they’re typically known for.

He answered the Roe V Wade question by talking about migrant crime, and handed Trump an easy response/diversion on his hardest question. Total flag maneuver. He threw the debate and hammed it up. Let Trump’s head get big and let the Republicans overcommit and overspend against the straw man before saying psyche.

A subversion of the “democratic” primary process, perhaps, but those have been a joke the past few cycles anyway. Not to mention “Superdelegates”. We need a constitutionally protected primarying and election process that isn’t run by the largest parties. I hope that it gets included in Kamala’s electoral reform package. Europe can hold snap elections, why can’t we? Europe has a sane system of parties that form alliances instead of an artificial binary choice. We need to upgrade our democracy to the 20th century advancements that we promoted elsewhere, and add further 21st century enhancements like ranked choice voting.

I am not saying it was orchestrated as much as navigated well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 79 points 3 months ago

Yooooooooo I am just so wrong this year and I'm all about it! Her AIPAC overseers won't be happy about that

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Here's a clip of her speech...

VP: "What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating. The images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety sometimes displaced for the second, third, or fourth time. We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies"

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1816600997873197308

[-] Bojimbo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

That passive voice is doing some heavy lifting.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 49 points 3 months ago

This will greatly confuse the tankies.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

Well its about fucking time. Reuters/ Ipsos results will be in next week.

Lets see if MI/ WI get back on the table and if MN is still a toss up. Its good strong rhetoric but the US has been on the wrong side of this issue for 9 months. One speech doesn't change that and there is damage to be fixed, but its always a first step. We froze Russian assets to fund the rebuilding of Ukraine. Should we freeze Israelli assets to pay for the rebuilding of Gaza? Lets hear some policy proposals.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Lets hear some policy proposals.

Here’s one simple trick that Harris can do on Day 1: Support the full inclusion of Palestine as a member at the United Nations.

(It’s possible that the UK or France might veto, but the US has generally been the obstacle to full recognition of Palestine at the UN.)

Once Palestine has international recognition as a state, it can start to benefit from international law, like the Geneva Convention.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

Good to see. Maybe we can all regroup and get behind her now so that we can keep America from becoming a fascist nightmare.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Yep. I said my main objection was the genocide, and - shockingly - I'm actually not a Russian bot and my vote can be won by better policy positions.

If she supports ranked choice voting, I'll go door to door for her.

[-] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago

I listened to it. It was an OK speech, but it willfully ignored the agency of Israel in the destruction of the Palestinian people. She called Hamas terrorists, but what about Israel? What do you call an administration and a nation's army that's committing genocide? She gave no scoldings to Israel, which to me is weak sauce.

[-] Arcity@feddit.nl 57 points 3 months ago

It would be electoral suicide if she did go all out.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

It's a stupid tightrope but in America almost every politician has to walk it. It doesn't help the the tightrope is a milkshake duck.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

The 269 - 144 House vote barring the State Department from even reporting Gaza death statistics should make it clear to anybody how powerful the Israel lobby is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 25 points 3 months ago

I think this was pretty much the best that could be expected from an american presidential candidate. Israel's position in the geopolitical balance of power makes it impossible for her to just outright denounce them. She's signalling that she's (hopefully) going to be less limp-wristed than Biden was on the issue, but the US's hands are largely tied when it comes to Israel - at least for as long as the forward outpost in the Middle East is as desirable as it still is to US interests.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Not just the strategic value, but also the fact that the Netanyahu camp and allies will cry "antisemitism" in the face of any significant criticism, which could be disastrous for an election campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
572 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS