this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2023
16 points (90.0% liked)

Linux

50281 readers
827 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've dabbled with Linux over the years, first with Ubuntu in the early 2010s, then Elementary OS when that dropped, and a few years ago I really enjoyed how customizable the gui was with Xubuntu. I was able to make it look just like WIndows 2000 which was really cool.

Which current distro has the best GUI, in your opinion? I find modern Ubuntu to feel a little basic and cheap. I guess I don't really like modern Gnome. I'm currently using Windows 10 LTSC which is probably the best possible version of Windows, but I'd jump to linux if I could find a distro with a gui that feels at least as polished and feature rich as Windows 10 LTSC.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pfr@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Distro is irrelevant. DE/WM choice is all that matters as far as GUI goes. Also, if you want a GUI that looks or feels like windows then KDE probably has you covered in that you could probably customise it to mimic windows.

I quite like the Desktop Environment in elementaryOS. I think it's called Pantheon Desktop? It's very polished. Or InstantWM from InstantOS is also interesting and has some nice animations and effects.

Personally, I use simple and minimal Openbox

[–] Jarmer@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Yes, exactly. haha, the distro has nothing to do with the GUI. That's your Desktop Environment. On almost every single popular distro you can get teh same DE's either through official offerings or community versions.

[–] TheBaldness@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

I'm going to hop in here and suggest you try out Linux Mint. This is a distro designed for people who are coming over from Windows or Mac. It "just works". The UI doesn't throw away thrity years of convention simply to be "linux". Everything is exactly where you expect it to be and most of what you need is already installed.
Mint offers a choice of different desktop environments which are all laid out exactly the same, but have differing degrees of polish. If you're using a very old PC, you may want to choose XFCE because it is very lean, but lacks some of the nice graphical touches. Most people just use the Cinnamon desktop environment, which is highly customizable and polished.
I fully switched to Mint many years ago and never looked back.

[–] timo@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Distro doesn't really matter nowadays. You can get all desktop environments to work on most distros. Especially the big players like KDE, Gnome, Xfce have hundred distros they are shipped with by default. Most big distros have versions for each of the most popular desktop environments. Therefore, I would suggest that you look for the distro which fits your needs best and then install the desktop environment you want to work with afterwards, if there isn't a flavor of your distro that ships with it already.

[–] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Feodora and Debian have a GNOME experience that has not been ruined to make less innovative in favor of making the UX more similar (and therefore familiar) to that of the worst desktop operating system available (windows).

If you've seen but never really used GNOME in a daily workflow it looks and feels alien. Thats becausethey devs are trying to make something that is friendly to the people who actually use it and intuitive to the people who are new to desktop computing, and they are making no attemt to appease thoes who believe that it is impossible to do better than Microsoft has with Windows.

If you've never really used it (and have used ms windows), Vanilla GNOME is alien to you. If you have really used it, nothing else is yet on its level.

[–] arthur@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

All of them. Every distro can run any desktop, so all of them.

[–] floppyslapper@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

You might be looking for a KDE desktop. Many of Windows's better more modern desktop features are copied from it, and KDE is very customizable out of the box without needing to install a bunch of extensions like you do with Gnome. KDE can be customized to fit many different desktop paradigms, with the default being like Windows 10.

[–] lysozyme@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Linux Mint Cinnamon. Stable, yet tons of customizations possible and makes the jump from Windows a whole lot easier (I jumped 1.5 years ago and will never look back).

[–] sudojonz@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

+1 for Linux Mint Cinnamon. It just works

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheOPtimal@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Fedora. It ships vanilla GNOME which is just a very pleasant experience. Vanilla GNOME is just something else man.

[–] SveetPickle@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used the Pop Os default for a long time and just recently switched to i3 Manjaro, it’s been pretty nice once you get past the learning curve of i3

[–] T0RB1T@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I'm pretty sure I'm legally required to post this anytime someone says they use Manjaro.

Manjaro was the first thing to get me to stop distro-hopping, so it pains me to admit that historically, it's been a very messy project. I've since moved onto openSUSE Tumbleweed and love it (I've also dabbled in NixOS, but it's a lot more hardcore).

If anyone wants the ease of Manjaro, with an Arch base, my understanding is that you should consider EndeavourOS.

Also, if you like i3 but want to use Wayland for any of its superior features, consider SwayWM.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Kubuntu or KDE Neon 100%

Ultimately they both use the KDE Plasma desktop environment, which is the only DE I've ever seen that has a proper modern look by default (others IMO look like either the 2000's or an OS 4 Kidz), as well as being pretty featurful for multi monitor productivity

Arch+KDE Plasma is what I personally am gonna switch to this summer

[–] Parsnip8904@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Check out KDE Debian spin too. I booted the live iso to check some stuff and was seriously impressed. Gave me the early ubuntu 10-11 vibe where the OS just stays out of your way.

[–] years_past_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Arch + KDE Plasma is very comfy, I used this myself for a few years and it felt super clean and unintrusive.

[–] png@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Its also pretty easy to get it setup to a semi-customized basic look and feel. Use one of the bigger themes, a popular Icon pack and a nice matching wallpaper as well as a little task bar customization and some widgets and youre set, and all this takes less than two hours.

[–] stefenauris@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

I've been preferring KDE lately tbh. Very flexible and familiar. Still don't know what that activity thing is for though lol

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i3, and swaywm , I have used almost ... All Linux/BSD/Windows/Osx/Unix Desktop Environments. I really like #enlightenment but it can be pretty buggy especially on wayland.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm currently quite happy with i3, but would really like to check out Wayland.

currently the support for barrier/synergy (controlling multiple computers with one keyboard/mouse) seems to be not there - although I saw something about a workaround with the newest synergy version.

would you be so kind to give me some other reasons to hold back?
Anything else that sucks in the new world?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Communist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It thoroughly depends on how much you're willing to configure

I think right now EWW + hyprland is the new hotness, if you're willing to edit text files and scripts

If not, go KDE if you like windows, gnome if you like mac.

[–] mariubrlu@mastodonapp.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

@bigbox with ZorinOS you won't feel the difference when coming from spydows. As soon as I made the switch to Linux I tested over 15 distros and I ended up with ZorinOS Core.

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Imo, I really like linux mint's cinnamon, its so clean and pretty.

I've been using linux on and off since my first experiments with zipslack back in 2000-2001, and full time since 2006. I've bounced around distros, tried countless DEs and WMs, and I have to say, Mint Cinnamon was the first where I didn't have to immediately change the theme/icons/color schemes/etc. to make it look decent (in my opinion). And add to that a more traditional desktop paradigm at a time when others (unity, gnome 3) were trying something else, and I was a convert, and still use it to this day, some 8+ years later.

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I tried many but for me, Linux mint cinnamon worked. It was traditional, but still had pkeyof customisation options. Also, to top it all off, it's light enough and works on a 13 year old pc I've got here.

[–] lodronsi@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I’m not experienced in all the options, but am quite happy with Cinnamon on Mint. I tried ElementaryOS first, 18 months ago, but it wasn’t quite right. Cinnamon had given me a few points to tweak, but not too many that I’ll be sucked into it. I can do what I want on my computer and don’t feel like the OS ui layer is in my way.

[–] Sewot@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

I like to use good ol' stable Debian with i3-gaps as a window manager.

[–] movodehe@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Currently I am using Cinnamon with Debian and quite like it. Previouly I enjoyed XFCE, espacially on slower laptops. Never really liked GNOME or KDE Plasma though. GNOME has too many animations and feels slow. At the same time its not very customizable. KDE on the other hand feels slow as well and though it is kind of fancy it seems not to be my taste and I did not like the way you customize either. That is not so important to me anymore. So please don't read from this that Cinnamon or XFCE would be great for customization. I would not know it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Absolutely love GNOME on Fedora. Workstations + Hotkeys are amazing. I really dig the minimalism and compartmentalisation it offers.

[–] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For some reason I find stock GNOME UIs appealing

load more comments
view more: next ›