468

Dems Name and Shame Companies Paying Executives More Than They Pay in Federal Taxes (www.commondreams.org)

submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 99 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Netflix, Ford, Tesla, T-Mobile, AIG, NextEra, Darden, MetLife, Duke Energy, First Energy, DISH, Principal Financial, American Electrical Power, Kinder Morgan, Dominion, Oneok, Williams, Xcel Energy, NRG Energy, Salesforce, DTE Energy, Ameren, Sempra Energy, U.S. Steel, Entergy, AmerisourceBergen, PPL, CMS Energy, Evergy, Voya Financial, Atmos Energy, Alliant Energy, Match Group, UGI, Agilent Tech

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago

The fact that there are companies that pay the executives more than they pay taxes is amazing. They shouldn't just name and shame, they should regulate

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

Sixteen in the clip and one in the hole Nate Dogg is about to make some bodies turn cold Now they droppin' and yellin', it's a tad bit late Nate Dogg and Warren G had to regulate

[-] frazw@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

The problem with conservatism though is that their voters will think this is a good thing. Taxes are bad full stop, so these companies are clever by lowering their tax bill. They don't see that the salaries are obscene. Then they complain about public services and infrastructure being bad.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Government doesn't work, and if you elect me I'll prove it!

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

A consistent conservative is also against companies of this size existing. In that case they'd be right.

Everything makes sense only in its own particular situation. Nothing is universally applicable. No, I don't like paradoxical statements.

But still things are right when they are right and wrong when they are wrong.

You can see Republican voters applying their rule of thumb in the wrong place. Democrats do that too with theirs.

Sometimes there's no bright future and we should just brace for impact.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago

If they COULDNT do this they would just take their Jobs to OTHER COUNTRIES and then Mom And Pop shops would have to Open Up to fill in the Gap and that's HORRIBLE!

[-] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

*Pearl clutching intensifies*

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 months ago

The official numbers almost certainly lie. The problem is far greater than reported.

[-] blurg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Gotta start somewhere though, gotta start somewhere.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Look at them not paying taxes

Despite them enabling the tax laws which allow them to pay no taxes. This is more political theater

[-] migo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

This is to pressure public opinion so that the remaining members of Congress and Senate vote to enable the ultra rich to pay their fair share.

It's not meaningless theater, it's politics, and effective political action.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago

Pressure public opinion? This implies that politicians and government gives a flying fuck what we think. When one billionaire has more political influence than millions of voters they don't care what we think. It's not like this is new news that nobody has heard of before. We've known this for decades, and nothing has changed. Even if they were taxed accordingly that money would not be reallocated to helping the working class.

Taxing the rich to save society is based on the assumption that taxation is required for the government to spend. The government can create money on a whim when they want it.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024

468 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers

2098 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News