-89
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

And she's a putin shill. So who cares.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

Welcome back.

In the sixty days since this account was created, it has made four thousand seven hundred and ninety-one submissions to Lemmy.

That averages out to one every eighteen minutes and two seconds twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago

The squad of vatniks running this really doesn't want to go to the front.

[-] pooperNickel@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Nah nah see it's cool because this user totally didn't get temp banned for the intentional bad faith practices they are doing. Definitely not that. But see if anyone else gets banned or moderated in any way, it's something we definitely should gleefully shove in their face for days as proof that they did something

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Be careful, I already got a warning and my comment deleted for analyzing and breaking down all of this information on another one of UniversalMonk's posts.

Apparently using math as a tool to show the objectively suspicious behavior of a user is somehow a "Rule 3 violation". Don't use your brains kids. That's against the rules!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I went on to the modlogs and read that removed comment of yours and I think mine will be okay.

Thanks for letting me know though.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein is a Russian plant, and anyone promoting her is a traitor.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

If you can't tell the difference between Harris and Trump, your political opinion is 110% invalid.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago

Right back on it, I see. Interesting how you once again choose to almost entirely post articles here about candidates you aren’t even voting for. Nothing happening for Rachel Fruit for the last three days of your absence? Can’t say that’s too surprising.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago

And man, I found this amusing:

…Stein told Reuters after a rally attended by about 100 people in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn on Sunday

Weekend rally in one of her supposed “strongholds” of support, and she only had 100 folks show up? There’s city council candidates there that get bigger turnout at events.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Just offer free food and you’d get more. It doesn’t even have to be good food.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They're back and posting BS! Jill (a Russian asset) is still more evil than Kamala, so it really doesn't matter what she thinks. I can't wait until the election is over so that you stop posting about the candidate that will lose.

[-] jhymesba@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Emphasis on this point.

Jill Stein has NO path to victory. She would require a 50%+1 majority in at least 270 EV worth of states. She doesn't even have 10% of the vote share in any state. Thus a vote for her is only marginally better than a vote for Trump, and about as effective as staying home on Election Day.

This particular poster's shiny object, Rechele Fruit, has even LESS of a chance. This candidate would require 50%+1 in three states, plus a successful write-in campaign for 50%+1 in another nine states (has that EVER happened in a SINGLE state) to get 87 EVs, a far cry from the 270 she needs to be elected. A vote for her is a fart in the wind. She doesn't even make the polling.

One of two people will take the Oath of Office in 2025. If you don't want Donald Trump and Project 2025 shoved up our privates, vote Harris. If you don't want Harris, for whatever reason, may you suffer the consequences of Project 2025 particularly harshly, though I doubt many of the shi...err, posters who post here bashing Harris and the Dems will have to suffer the consequences of their claimed votes.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mostly agree, with one correction:

Thus a vote for her is only marginally better than a vote for Trump

It isn’t. A vote for her IS a vote for trump, because FPTP voting means a (fake) non-right candidate can only siphon votes from the left.

Here’s a great video that shows why, mathematically, she can only help trump win, and explains why a lot of Stein’s money comes from Republican (and Russian) interests. She’s not grass-roots, and she’s not left-leaning. Saying she’s a Russian asset is not hyperbole.

She’s not marginally better than trump – she’s actively anti-democratic.

e: my autocorrect really hates me today.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Shill Stein just needs to come out and say that she supports Trump and Putin. Stop skirting around the issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
-89 points (14.4% liked)

politics

19086 readers
3977 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS