223
submitted 2 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The first article in the Mount Vernon News last fall about a planned solar farm simply noted that residents were “expressing their concern.” But soon the county’s only newspaper was packed with stories about solar energy that almost uniformly criticized the project and quoted its opponents.

Then a new “grassroots” organization materialized and invited locals to an elaborate event billed as a town hall, with a keynote speaker who denied that humans cause climate change.

Someone sent text messages to residents urging them to “stop the solar invasion” and elect two county commission candidates who opposed the solar farm. And one day this past March, residents received an unfamiliar newspaper that contained only articles attacking Frasier Solar, a large project that would replace hundreds of acres of corn and soybeans with the equivalent of 630 football fields of solar panels.

To many in the deep-red central Ohio community, it seemed that solar had become the focus of news and politics. They were right. Fossil fuel interests were secretly working to shape the conversation in Knox County.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

The same people complaining will act confused when their electric bill goes up later due to relying on fossil fuels.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Fuck them hard - we really need to take off the fucking kids gloves as we're already clearly feeling the pain of more extreme climate.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Why would they be concerned? Like what is bad about using the land for that instead of growing corn? How would it hurt anyone? That's how you know it's bullshit. The article doesn't even say and I'm assuming it's because the original campaign didn't really say either lol

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

How would it hurt anyone?

I don't know about the situation there, but in some places in Spain, there are agricultural workers who are upset about the conversion of plant farms to solar farms, because the solar farms require less labor, so they're unhappy about job losses. From what I've read, it's been something of a political hot topic there.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Here in Ohio a lot of criticism is that they think it’s ugly.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

Well, I mean, it's not like the field is there to provide ornamentation to people driving down the road, and it's not like the people complaining own the field. The person could build whatever they wanted there. A row of pink barns, I dunno. That's not specific to solar farms. Maybe there's someone who doesn't like the aesthetic of a field of soy or something.

I don't personally find solar farms particularly beautiful or ugly.

Not solar, but I'll concede a point to the people who don't like wind turbines on ridgelines, because then when the sun sets behind them, they create enormous flashing shadows as they rotate that are really hard to ignore if you're in the path of the shadow. Most of the time they don't do it, of course, but when they do, it's a pain.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
223 points (99.1% liked)

News

23680 readers
4097 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS