855
submitted 2 months ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 163 points 2 months ago

Isn't it all unicode at the end of the day, so it supports anything unicode supports? Or am I off base?

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago

Ssh! 🫢 You’ll ruin the joke!

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago

Okay but how does starting a secure shell help?

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

Are you serious? I just explained that to you two seconds ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago

Yes, but the language/compiler defines which characters are allowed in variable names.

[-] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I thought the most mode sane and modern language use the unicode block identification to determine something can be used in valid identifier or not. Like all the 'numeric' unicode characters can't be at the beginning of identifier similar to how it can't have '3var'.

So once your programming language supports unicode, it automatically will support any unicode language that has those particular blocks.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Sanity is subjective here. There are reasons to disallow non-ASCII characters, for example to prevent identical-looking characters from causing sneaky bugs in the code, like this but unintentional: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack (and yes, don't you worry, this absolutely can happen unintentionally).

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

OCaml’s old m17n compiler plugin solved this by requiring you pick one block per ‘word’ & you can only switch to another block if separated by an underscore. As such you can do print_แมว but you couldn’t do pℝint_c∀t. This is a totally reasonable solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

I think they exclude some unicode characters from being use in identifiers. At least last I tried it wouldn't allow me to use an emoji as a variable name.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] maniel@sopuli.xyz 91 points 2 months ago
[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago

Thank you for this cursed knowledge.

[-] 00L10@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

May I introduce you to emojicode...

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Am I blind? I can't see where 👀 is defined.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Take a look at all the struct definition. It's a pure virtual method of 🍴 with a bunch of overrides in the structs that inherit from 🍴.

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Oh, right, using the same function name in multiple structs is what threw me off

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 90 points 2 months ago

Let's hope Ea-nāṣir's code is better than his copper.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 34 points 2 months ago

I hear it's prone to Rust.

[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 68 points 2 months ago

Ea Nasir over here selling subpar code now

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 2 months ago

Security by ~~Obscurity~~ Antiquity

[-] EonNShadow@pawb.social 53 points 2 months ago
[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 28 points 2 months ago

Don't you mean 𒁷𒀱𒀉?

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

now that's job security

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unironically awesome. You can debate if it hurts the ability to contribute to a project, but folks should be allowed to express themselves in the language they choose & not be forced into ASCII or English. Where I live, English & Romantic languages are not the norm & there are few programmers since English is seen as a perquisite which is a massive loss for accessibility.

The hotter take: languages like APL, BQN, & Uiua had it right building on symbols (like we did in math class) for abstract ideas & operations inside the language, where you can choose to name the variables whatever makes sense to you & your audience.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah. Tbh, I always wondered why programming languages weren't translated.

I know CS is all about english, but at least the default builtin functions of programming languages could get translated (as well as APIs that care about themselves).

Like, I can't say I don't like it this way (since I'm a native english speaker), but I still wonder what if you could translate code.

Variables could cause problems (more work with translation or hard to understand if not translated). But still - programming languages have no declentions and syntax is simpler so it shouldn't even compare to "real" languages with regards to difficulty of implementation.

[-] hikaru755@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I'm German, and I would not want that. German grammar works differently in a way that makes programming a lot more awkward for some reason. Things like, ".forEach" would technically need three different spellings depending on the grammatical gender of the type of element that's in the collection it's called on. Of course you could just go with neuter and say it refers to the "items" in the collection, but that's just one of lots of small pieces of awkwardness that get stacked on top of each other when you try to translate languages and APIs. I really appreciate how much more straightforward that works with English.

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Programs aren’t written by a single team of developers that speak the same language. You’d be calling a library by a Hungarian with additions from an Indian in a framework developed by Germans based on original work by Mexicans.

If no-one were forcing all of them to use English by only allowing English keywords, they’d name their variables and functions in their local language and cause mayhem to readability.

[Edit:] Even with all keywords being forced to English, there’s often half-localized code.

I can’t find the source right now, but I strongly believe that Steve McConnell has a section in one of his books where he quotes a function commented in French and asks, “Can you tell the pitfall the author is warning you about? It’s something about a NullPointerException”. McConnell then advises against local languages even in comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly it wouldn't even be that hard to release full translated versions of existing programming languages. Like Python in Punjabi or Kotlin in Chinese or something (both of which already support unicode variable/class/function names). Just have a lookup table to redefine each keyword and standard library name to one in that language, it can literally just be an additional translation layer above the compiler/interpreter that converts the code to the original English version.

It's honestly really surprising that non-English speakers have developed entirely new programming languages in their own language (unfortunately none of which are getting very widespread use even among speakers of that language), but the practice of simply translating a widely used and industry standard English programming language doesn't seem to be much of a thing.

If I ever make my own programming language, I'm probably going to bake multi-language support into the compiler. Just supply it with a lookup table of translated terms and the code in that language.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

This is how we end up with snow crash.

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 months ago

Iltam sumra rashupti ilatim moment 🗿

[-] SsxChaos@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago

Wtf I just said these words out loud and the furniture started floating o.o

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://www.soas.ac.uk/baplar/recordings/ammi-ditanas-hymn-istar-read-k-hecker

So i guess iltam = goddess and ilatim = gods?

litta = praise be (to), zumrā = sing of and rašubti = fearsome being?

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Bro thats fucking amazing 😂

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 2 months ago

Most languages are like this. Even C is like this.

[-] basmati@lemmus.org 21 points 2 months ago

Depends on the compiler, I'm pretty sure some versions of Borland shit themselves if you introduce an accent mark at the wrong time, much less support Unicode.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 32 points 2 months ago
[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 4 points 2 months ago

Amazing that someone would ask that on Piazza.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago

I don't know much about coding, but I know Cuneiform isn't an alphabet.

[-] christian@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

It really bugs me when people don't comment their code at all. I have no idea what this is supposed to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

Because it supports Unicode as variable/class/function names and Unicode includes all the characters humans have ever used, even dead languages (I assume for historians to digitize ancient texts?)

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 2 months ago

So we can automate spell glyphs now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

Sexigesimal is the best numbering system, change my mind

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 6 points 2 months ago

You can't trick me, I know a bullet hell when I see one.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
855 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32706 readers
671 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS