132
There are definitely tracks where you can easily exceed 234kph.
Just tell all of the recommendation algos that my interests are this.
Yeah it's bad news when the title has to parenthetically clue you in that it's popular, lol.
And being on a track in a controlled environment. Going anywhere near this speed on a shared road is absolutely unconscionable in any conditions.
Err... Is your team doing planning during standup? I've never heard of that, from either people who are on teams that use standups, or from any of the Agile/Scrum literature that I've seen. In my experience, standups are typically about either a) coordinating the execution of work that has already been committed to, or b) whoops just a status meeting and everybody's tuned out.
Just generally not being a jerk, in a situation where people are often jerks.
In a narrow sense, it's useful for like... e.g. location-based search...So of you search "cosmetic dentistry," it's useful to privilege results closer to you (or at least you could make that argument). But broadly, in practice, "personalization" is primarily optimized for the ad buyer or first-party company's goals (e.g. engagement, click-through) as per phases 2 and 3 of the enshittification cycle... And we know what happens to secondary goals as systems become increasingly optimized.
So I'm not claiming that it can't be los dos, and indeed in phase 1 it definitely is... I'm claiming that it isn't los dos, in practice, at this moment in history.
What options do we have to stabilize a renewable energy system and make it long term viable?
A good example of a time where you really need to full-ass it.
No, no, they have a point: The original native population DID do a better job... But then Republicans and Democrats.
People don't die because they panic. They panic because they are dying.
Por que no los dos? Crowd crush incidents don't require panic (see: 2015 Mina "stampede"), but it's hard to imagine that e.g. the Iroquois Theater Fire wasn't significantly worsened by the (justifiable) panic of the crowd.
Of course the primary reason in both cases is related to the spaces that the crowds were inhabiting... But the effect of panic pretty clearly multiplies the effect IMO.
287
For reference (as per Wikipedia):
Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure.
— Melvin E. Conway
Imagine interpreting that as advice on how you should try to design things, lol.
Tbf, I think most of the post is just typical LinkedIn fluff, but I didn't want to take the poor fellow out of context.
view more: next ›
thanks_shakey_snake
joined 1 year ago
Thanks for explaining. I still think "planning" is a weird way to think about what's supposed to happen during standup-- It seems to me that the whole purpose of working in sprints (and the rituals that that typically entails) is to plan ahead so that during the week you can execute on well-groomed, properly-scoped work. Of course when you notice something is wrong, or needs to be reconsidered, you might need to pull the brakes and realign mid-sprint, but my sense is that if you're doing planning every day, that might mean that your work isn't groomed well enough beforehand, or you're not locking in important decisions during sprint planning.
But it might depend on the work, and it might depend on what you mean by "planning." If your planning just looks like "Hey are you free to pair on issue 123 this afternoon? Okay sweet, I'll throw a meeting in your calendar," then yeah sure-- I wouldn't use the word "planning" for that, but it's not crazy to. Or maybe the work is different than my work, and actually does warrant some amount of day-level of planning that wouldn't make sense for teams I've been on. I'm open to that, too.
(Btw I tried to look up this "planning planning feedback feedback cycle" thing and the only search results I got were THIS LEMMY THREAD, lol... Cool to see Lemmy show up in search results)