442
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago

This is major league copium. The fact is that Trump's opponent got way more votes in 2020 than in 2024, and had the blue turnout in 2024 equaled what it was in 2020, he would not have won in 2024. Period.

[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I'm really not sure why these conversations are still going on. It's painfully clear that Dems lost this election because of voter turnout.

[-] cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

At this point it's just sad to see the impotent denial of facts of some people. He won the election and the popular vote. End of story.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

Great! We can relish the fact that he didn't win over the majority of Americans as our country descends into a fascist hellhole run by billionaires, war hawks and rapists.

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

just to be clear, this isn't really a failing of the dems per say, not to say they didn't have issues, they did. But this was a global shift away from incumbency. This seems to be more of a response to covid and inflation more than anything else possibly could've influenced it.

Lucky break for trump, dems just have to come back stronger i guess.

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 17 points 12 hours ago

You all need to get your "Fuck Trump" flags made and start driving around with them for the next 4 years.

[-] renegadespork@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

The only thing of note here is that since the winner got <50%, then I’m guessing 3rd party votes were slightly higher this election.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

1.7% in 2024.
1.9% in 2020.
5.7% in 2016.
1.7% in 2012.
1.4% in 2008.

2024 is not the outlier. It's mostly about how well the other major party candidate does.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

So, 4% less in 2024 than in 2016, the last time he won. That by itself stands in pretty stark contrast to those who want to blame his victory on people who voted for a third party.

Trump won in 2024 chiefly because millions upon millions of Dems who voted in 2020 stayed home in 2024. That's the reality.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 hours ago

Trump won in 2024 chiefly because millions upon millions of Dems who voted in 2020 stayed home in 2024. That’s the reality.

probably also a mix of lack of accessible voting, so the soy peeps who are bitching and moaning right now, are probably in the crowd of people that didn't vote (or just actually busy people, idk)

and malaise towards the incumbency (global phenomenon)

[-] Angrywaffle2@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

That's still a win in the popular vote. He has a mandate.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago

It's a plurality and not a majority, pretty far from a mandate. It's a legal win.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

Usually, "mandate" used to mean overwhelming support from the majority. If these percentages hold up, donvict has a plurality. Even if he had a bare majority with Kamala and him having ~1.5% delta, it's not like it is some real mandate, either...

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 29 points 18 hours ago

He still won the popular vote.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 6 hours ago

i think in presidential elections in order to "win" you need at minimum a 51% vote. Otherwise you don't actually win, but i could be mixing some shit up lol.

Voting is fucking weird.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 6 hours ago

You can win the presidency with as little as 22% of the popular vote. https://youtu.be/7wC42HgLA4k

[-] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago

By being less less poplar than he was last election, because the Dems were even less poplar

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 11 points 15 hours ago

What do poplar trees have to do with this ?

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 12 hours ago

Their wood is too soft to stand up to the Republicans, the Democrats need something stronger, like oak or maple.

[-] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I kinda like the sound of Maplecrat.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what Yew can do for your country!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 19 hours ago

It won't matter. He, and his cultists, will continue to claim otherwise.

[-] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I mean his vote share went down, he still has more votes than kamala.

So they don't need to say anything he still won the popular core

[-] AidsKitty@lemmy.world 63 points 21 hours ago

This is a ridiculous argument. Orange man won the electoral college, got the most votes, won the senate, house of reps, the presidency, and the supreme court. What more is there to lose?

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago

Plenty of coping from the liberal corporate media, instead of admitting that liberals abandoned the working class to court the monied interests.

idk why people keep yapping about abandoning the working class, it mostly just seems like a dogwhistle to a general dissatisfaction that never seems to go away.

People were doing the same shit before biden dropped out, saying they would support someone else, like kamala. That happened, and then they didn't.

how would the liberals court the working class? would electing a fucking immigrant factory worker do it? At what point does the working class actually go "you know what, i agree, i will vote for this person" because the problem is, you can't just put some guy in the seat, we did that with trump, it was a horrendous mistake, and trump should have some idea of how this stuff works.

You need someone politically educated and experienced, capable of representing the people, like biden. There's a reason he got so much legislation through the government, even with how polarized it is right now.

unless of course, you want to overthrow the government, and install a dictator. That would also work.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
442 points (91.7% liked)

politics

19108 readers
4371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS