this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
90 points (97.9% liked)

News

36000 readers
2657 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Insurers say prior authorization helps control costs by preventing medically unnecessary care, but patients say the process can delay or deny access to needed treatments.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago (4 children)

We need nationalized healthcare. Now. There are 32 developed nations on earth. 31 of them have nationalized healthcare options. We are the only country that does not.

Why are conservatives (and neo-liberals) so opposed to modern healthcare?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

"I know my job makes the world a worse place and my boss treats me like trash, I wish I could just quit and pursue my own dreams, but I need health insurance!"

[–] Retix@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

There are, unfortunately, many people who only get enjoyment out of other people's jealousy. They are proud that they have "good" insurance that covers everything, in the same way they are proud of their expensive house/car/boat/etc. If everyone has that thing, they aren't special and it isn't a cool toy because anyone could

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's because it'd end a lot of jobs and moneymaking opportunities. Imagine all those huge insurance companies just... not being needed the day nationalized healthcare happens. What about all those administrators who fill out the paper work in doctor's offices?

OTOH, it might also be what's needed to cool down the job market in the US.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lot of typewriter repair jobs got ended by the advent of computers but we didn't let that stop us, we shouldn't protect obvious economic inefficiencies like this just to reward already affluent people

[–] HooPhuckenKarez@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

You're bullshit opinion is why I can't find a decent, locally made, buggy whip.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

I'm just saying that one thing most politicians do not want to be seen to do is get rid of any jobs. This is why it's hard to get traction with it - it'll hurt them politically directly(people think nationalized health care is worse or bad), it'll hurt their campaigns (cause contributions), and it'll hurt them on "the economy" because they "killed lots of good jobs".

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Prior authorization" is bullshit. You know what kind of prior authorization you need for a procedure or prescription? The doctor fucking ordering it.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I love needing to get 'prior' authorization once a year to continue taking the same medication I have taken for the last decade.

No, I don't want to try the ones that don't work again just because they look similar on your spreadsheet.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

What I like is having to get "prior authorization" for an antidepressant that I've been taking for years, and then I run out because it's the weekend and nobody can get hold of anybody for anything.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Haha. Succinct.

[–] RozhkiNozhki@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I'm sure there's plenty of examples but I'm going to share one from my work experience.

We had a patient who survived a really bad car accident but their jaw was broken in 4 (four) places. One of those cases when the doctor will wire your mouth shut leaving a small hole for the straw so you can drink your soup for the next x weeks.

The patient had a facial reconstructive surgery coming and their surgeon ordered an MRI of their jaw to see where the pieces were before cutting them open. The patient, unfortunately, had one of those cheapo insurance plans that were provided by their employer. Said insurance denied the MRI authorization 3 (three!) times due to "lack of medical necessity". It took us literal hours of arguing with that arsehole adjustor and their supervisors on the phone until they finally approved it.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The federal government has proposed ways to reform prior authorization that would require insurance companies to provide more transparency about denials and to speed up their response times.

So insurance companies can keep doing the same bullshit, they just need to send you more meaningless fine print about it more quickly. Gee, thanks Biden administration.

If finalized, those federal changes [wouldn't ] be implemented [until] 2026.

Ok, I already said my sarcastic "thanks," you can stop making it worse now.

But even then, the rules would apply only to some categories of health insurance, including Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid plans, but not employer-sponsored health plans. That means roughly half of all Americans wouldn’t benefit from the changes.

Ffs