658
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nausiyan 15 points 4 days ago
[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

A Slackware user and Gentoo user sitting at the bar both grunt and turn back around

[-] wildflower@lemmy.world 97 points 6 days ago

As long as its not twitter :-)

[-] hogmomma@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago
[-] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 30 points 6 days ago

posted from my thinkpad running Arch

[-] ADTJ@feddit.uk 14 points 5 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 7 points 5 days ago

ಠ_ಠ

(I use fedora btw)

Challenge level: impossible

[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

except. EXCEPT! i came here to get away from the other places. every other post is about reddit, bluesky, or fucking twitter. holy fuck.

linux is actually dope. i used debian btw

[-] hogmomma@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lemmy's become the place to talk about other places.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We get it, no matter how many times people get fucked by venture capital pushing enshittification, most people don't actually care enough about the issues at hand to deal with even the minor discomfort of learning something new that isn't highly polished. They'll take getting fucked by corporations every time.

Edit: lol

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 81 points 6 days ago

I mean.....you say this with an air of sarcasm, because you DO care about decentralization. But I've been saying since I got here, with no sarcasm, that Lemmy is not a competitor to reddit. Mastodon is not a competitor to twitter. The fediverse is not appealing to the masses on it's own current merrit. And why?

Because it's main selling point is that it's decentralized. And any average woman named Britney, or any average guy named Todd, does not give a shit about that. At all. At all. At all.

They don't know what it is. They don't care what it is. They just want to see what Taylor Swift is saying online. They just want to follow Nascar. They just want to follow all the accounts that you view as corporate branding. That's what they WANT.

I've said in other threads various ways to get the concepts of the fediverse to be looked at. But it takes us, the fediverse, to appear to be appealing to the masses instead of scary.

It needs to feel like a walled garden. It can act as a decentralized service on a technical end. You can wizard of oz the shit out of it. Stay behind a curtain and keep all the scary technical stuff hidden. The technical stuff can still work, but you guys are pushing it front and center like it's a selling point. It's not. It's scary to them, and bluesky looks and feels just like twitter, without the fascism. That's all they want.

Nobody is over on bluesky asking if bluesky is truely decentralized. Nobody there knows what that is. Nobody cares. It would be like me inventing my own currency that only works in an office I work in. Then wondering why the other offices in that building aren't adopting my currency. They don't care about my currency. It means nothing to them.

The fediverse had years of a headstart, and learned nothing. I don't have the technical skills to build. What I do have is the ability to blend in with any crowd and understand what they're feeling. So I understand them. I understand you. And I understand the difference in mentality between them and you. I also understand that you guys DON'T understand their mentality. And they don't even know your mentality exists.

The best way to describe it is, they are like a bunch of flies. They just want to fly to the nearest lightbulb. And you guys are putting on one of those blacklights to expose all the filthy stains around you. And the flies literally land in and eat shit happily, so they don't care about the stains. Yet you're so tunnel visioned that all you see are the stains, and are certain the flys will care. Then a neighbor turns on a porchlight, and they all fly over there.

Also the previous big light was a bug zapper.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 6 days ago

This is so correct it's actually unreal. Really well put, solid comment.

Extraordinary well put.I wish more people would understand that building communities by attracting users from outside is much-much-much more important than to brag about fediverse in your small nerd circle and defederating another server.

[-] punkaccountant@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

While sometimes I think…do we really want it to get super popular? But also even if the popularity comes with the assholes…blocking and curating can help and in the end, it IS still decentralized. So let’s say that convinces the average Lemmy user that yes, let’s grow this shit.

How do we get some of the big names here to promote it? I tell anyone who has a complaint with standard social media about the fediverse but I have minimal influence. I HAVE included it on surveys and contact with podcasts I follow, to promote it more, again limited influence.

I feel like we need like…whatever…a Taylor Swift type to take it up as something they push and then other big names will follow.

As you said, I don’t care about that really but many others do. Lemmy and occasional checkins with Reddit are my only social media. But if it gets more people here, it could be worth it. I personally would just love more communities to be more active because I like Lemmy…but right now I only see the biggest “Reddit copycats” getting the major activity.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

I said before, the biggest thing is handles. If Taylor Swift came to the fediverse, I assume her twitter handle is @TaylorSwift

If she came to Lemmy, or Mastodon, her handle would be "@TaylorSwift@Mastodon.social" or "@TaylorSwift@Lemmy.World"

But then I could myself register "@TaylorSwift@Lemm.ee" or "@TaylorSwift@Mastodon.world"

And I could just be Taylor Swift.

What she has to do, and this goes for any public figure, is protect her brand. Her brand is Taylor Swift. Anything at all which creates confusion or infringing on use regarding that name is a problem for her. She needs to keep Taylor Swift exclusively to herself.

Just as Kellogs would want all use of the word Kellogs to belong to them.

So to attract them, they won't come unless they can be the sole and exclusive @TaylorSwift

That's the important part. She wants to be @TaylorSwift.

Not @TaylorSwift@Mastodon.social.

So to do this, I shouldn't be able to create an identical handle, on a different instance.

The fediverse needs to all communicate with each other. I don't have a peertube account. But since I'm Lost_My_Mind, that exact handle should no longer be in the pool of available peertube account names. And if I were to sign up, with the email from this Lemmy account, I wouldn't even chose a handle. It would automatically choose Lost_My_Mind. The accounts would be the same.

Because at the end of the day, what celbrities want is one easy place for all people to reach them. Right now with X and Bluesky being two systems that aren't interconnected, this splits the audience. We already know America is divided. Almost down the middle.

So the LAST thing celebrities, and brands want is bluesky to take off. Because then you'd have X with its right wing views, and bluesky with it's left wing views. And then brands will have to make two accounts. One on X, one on bluesky. They'd much rather say they have one account with 40 million followers than 2 accounts. One with 22 million followers, and another account with 18 million followers.

And the thing nobody is taking into consideration is the scaling of the fediverse. You can have all of X and all of bluesky on the fediverse. All decentralized. But because 98% won't notice the decentralized aspect, they won't care. They'll just stick to their little corner of the fediverse. And you'll stick to your corner, and in the middle will be brands.

And both sides can connect to brands from their corner of the fediverse. The only reason brands care to pick a side, is because analytics tells them one side is more likely to financially support them. But they'll happily take subscribers and money from the other side. Red states? Blue states? Doesn't matter. All they care about is green states!

And the potential is there. People who want a small fediverse can scale their individual view smaller. People who want it bigger can scale it bigger. It literally has the ability to please both sides wishes. It just has to be implemented properly.

But it may actually be already too late. The bluesky ball has started rolling. Sometimes it's not about logic. You can have a factually better option, but still lose by having inferior numbers.

Right now, bluesky has an artificial solution to the handles issue. You're @handle@bsky.app, but EVERYONE is @bsky.app unless you use a custom domain. So realistically you're just @handle unless specified otherwise.

Same way a website is just website.com, even though it's really https://www.website.com

The https://www. is implied, just like the @bsky.app is going to be implied as time goes on.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago

It's not about "minor discomfort." The Fediverse has too much UX friction for someone that isn't in tech/used to a product that isn't mature in features or content. Even if they are fine with that, they need to spend time to figure out what server(s) to trust, or at least an organization they can sue if things go wrong.

Ranting about "normies" instead of listening and understanding what their needs and concerns are is not conducive to growth, but it'll certainly help it decay.

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Exactly. Most Fediverse fans always go on a rant about "corporations", "enshittification", whatever, when they don't understand that not everyone will take/have time to learn about these things. Not everything is simple as in just click a big "download" button or "create account". It's those new extra steps that confuse those people, some who are of old age, or never saw a desktop computer before. It needs actual designers. Same thing with other FOSS projects.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

and when they do figure out the unintuitive UX, they’re met with an avalanche of reply guys and, if they’re Black, a fuckload of overt and covert racism that everyone else will ignore…

there’s a reason why most people on the fedi are white men in tech

only the queer community seems to have managed to carve itself a place on the fedi, and even it has big issues of rampant racism

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 6 days ago
[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

I've seen this term on Mastadon. I'm actually confused by it a bit, since I've always thought replies are to be expected on the Internet.

I think women have a problem with men following them and replying in an overly familiar manner, or mansplaining, or something like that. I'm old, used to forums, and never used Twitter, so I may be missing some sort of etiquette that developed there. I generally don't reply at all on Mastadon because of this, and really, I'm not sure what Mastadon or microblogging is for. Seems to be for developing personal brands, and for creators of content to inform followers of what they created. Seems not to be for discussion. I.e. more like RSS than Reddit (that's my understanding at least).

[-] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 days ago

basically, someone online (usually a man) who replies to another person (usually a woman) in a condescending tone, or giving unsolicited advice, that sorta stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 7 points 6 days ago
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

Lemmevangelists really like the email analogy because they think literally anyone knows or cares how email works. 99% of people lose you the moment you say the word "protocol"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 30 points 6 days ago

Tech enthusiasts vastly overestimate how much hassle people are willing to put up with in order to do something, and this is a classic example.

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Seriously the number of people on here complaining about Windows bloat. I'm not even 100% sure what the hell that's supposed to mean. I'm a normie and my windows runs fine.

Edit:spelling

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

And no matter how many times FOSS developers are shown that real people don't care about products with shitty UX, they won't put time in making their product accessible.

See how that goes?

Wanna fix federated platforms? Make the backend dumb and the frontend smart. No one that has a life wants to learn about instances and all that bullshit, decentralize the storage and let anyone create a frontend where people can connect and check the content, one credential to access everything, defederation doesn't affect the users, no admins just moderators.

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago

I feel the same way about linux. Every post remotely related to tech brings on the linux bro trying to convert you to their religion of linux

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 5 days ago

I used to be mad about Linux for the same reason. In more recent times I have a different feeling, but I can't deny how annoying they can be.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I've just made peace with it tbh

[-] lipilee@feddit.nl 21 points 5 days ago

Are we ~~there~~ federated yet?

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 5 days ago
[-] Funkwonker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 days ago

They would have come to Lemmy if it was the platform they wanted. We can bitch and moan about them wanting something that we think is against their best interests, but what'll that do?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ooli@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Any social platform, from fb, to reddit and youtube worth only as much as the number of people using it. Less people = less creative mind = less potential friend = less incentive to come use the same platform = less public for creative mind. So social media can only work as a monopoly or quasi. Or it is of no one interest to come on it, if all your friend/favorite creator, are on the other platform.

Ergo, you have to do some proselytism so everyone join the platform you're using. That being said: did you create your account on bluesky?

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Well that's not true at all. I don't think most of us are going on social media to communicate with billions of people. If we can communicate with tens of thousands of people, or perhaps less than that, but those are high quality communications, that's good enough for many or most of us.

Which is to say, quality of other users, quantity of users, and quality of service are all important when trying to evaluate the overall quality of any social media provider.

Of course your goal could be different if all you want is exposure. If you want to advertise, then large numbers of users might be your priority. But most of us are not doing that.

[-] ooli@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

If none of your family /friend are on facebook, you wont use it. If you cant find like minded people on Lemmy, you wont use it.

Less people mean on average you have less chance to have your friend/family there, or like minded people or 'quality' people. Just on average.

We can argue that some platform get all the good people, but I think that is mostly a false belief

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

For the most part yes, but not always and also once it gets too big you lose those same creative minds to the sea of trash and mediocrity

load more comments (2 replies)

Should have had the Mastedon logo on Shrek's head

[-] TGhost@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

And don't complain about BS to get content, and then post it here, ofc

[-] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 6 days ago

I don't get it, could you explain?

[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Probably mean the weird double standard where a big portion of the content on lemmy is bluesky screenshots and no one complains about them, but somehow whenever you mention bluesky as an alternative to twitter people will completely ignore the features that make it more popular than mastodon and demonise it to make it sound as bad as twitter.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
658 points (93.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26972 readers
4828 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS