301

Israeli Government Imposes Sanctions on Haaretz, Cuts All Ties and Pulls Advertising (www.haaretz.com)

submitted 6 days ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Israel's government approved on Sunday a proposal by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi that mandates any government-funded body refrain from communicating with Haaretz or placing advertisements in the paper. The proposal was approved by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The decision, according to the government's explanation, is a reaction to "many articles that have hurt the legitimacy of the state of Israel and its right to self defense, and particularly the remarks made in London by Haaretz publisher, Amos Schocken, that support terrorism and call for imposing sanctions on the government."

The proposal did not appear on the government's agenda published ahead of the weekly cabinet meeting. The Attorney General's office, unaware of the intention to bring the proposal to a vote, did not review it at all and did not present its opinion, as customary. The resolution was presented to ministers during the discussion without any legal opinion.

In a speech at the Haaretz conference in London last month, Schocken said "the Netanyahu government doesn't care about imposing a cruel apartheid regime on the Palestinian population. It dismisses the costs of both sides for defending the settlements while fighting the Palestinian freedom fighters, that Israel calls terrorists."

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 84 points 6 days ago

The only democracy in the middle east...

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

And let's not forget their "Western Values".

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Suppressing the press IS western values these days.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago

First Al-Jazeera, now Haaretz. Freedom of the press going strong in the apartheid state.

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 74 points 6 days ago

What? Isn't Haaretz like the main media outlet in Israel?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 93 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

One of them, and also the most left-leaning. The Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post lean right, and are generally supportive of Israel and its genocide.

Edit: I should also note that these are the English-language publications. They have others in Hebrew and other languages, but you don't see them posted in English-language communities for obvious reasons.

[-] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nope. It’s a prominent one, but by no means the “main” media outlet. It’s also largely in opposition to Netanyahu and his coalition.

Source:

As of July 31, 2023, a TGI survey indicated that Israel Hayom, distributed for free, is Israel's most read newspaper, with a 29.4% weekday readership exposure, followed by Yedioth Ahronoth, with 22.3%, Haaretz with 4.8%, Globes with 4% and Maariv with 3.9%.[1]

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 6 days ago

Thank you for the states. Haaretz seems to the source most foreign media quote.

[-] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 16 points 5 days ago

Good preview for what's going to happen to the new York times under the new admin :)

[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago

Israel has become the ultimate Karen

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago

Hitler it a better name for such behaviour

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] circuitfarmer 8 points 4 days ago

Anyone else feel like WWIII has already started?

To put it in context, we are seeing much of the same stuff in terms of media grabs and power grabs that was seen in the 1930s around the world. What is left is Hitler invading Poland.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Can Russia invading Ukraine and Israel invading Lebanon be enough.

[-] circuitfarmer 3 points 4 days ago

"Best I can do is Russia invading Ukraine and Israel invading Lebanon."

Humor aside (take it where you can), yes, I think that's enough.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pulls advertising? Why would a government advertise in a news paper? Do they have new products coming next year?

[-] freeman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

There are legitimate uses like health information campaigns (vaccination campaigns, anti smoking campaigns) and other informatio campaigns.

Advertising is probably a misnaming.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 7 points 5 days ago

The paper will still sell the spaces as advertising regardless of whether it's an advert of a public announcement from the government, so advertising is probably right.

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 days ago

Next year, genocide v2.0.0! More efficient, more deadly and with twice the US support!

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

Common practice in many places. Not the government per se, but various state organizations to from healthcare to infrastructure to administration etc.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

It’s called propaganda.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago

My respect for Haaretz suddenly increased, I didnt regularly read them so I didnt know tbh.

[-] small44@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

The only democracy in the middle east

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 6 days ago

I wonder where Haaretz will relocate to Meduza-style when it’s impossible to continue operating from within Israel.

[-] TGhost@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The true and trustful information are hurting ,hey

load more comments

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024

301 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39174 readers

3106 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.