148

The chickens weren't doing the coke. I think.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hegar@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago

According to the owner, the chickens were there (and I quote) "For eat", which I just love. Considering the drugs, the drug sales ledger and the ammo - probably it's cock fighting, yeah?

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

Well who knows, maybe they were part of an elaborate airline miles fraud scheme like in that one Always Sunny episode

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t get how there is outrage about chickens fighting when basically all bars serve dead chickens?

[-] solomon42069@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not sure if you're serious but I'll answer in case...

The problem with cock fighting is the vicious animal cruelty. Even in places where it's fully legal and socially accepted they do nasty stuff like attach a blade to the leg so that when the birds attack each other it slices the opponent and ends the fight faster.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think you're underestimating the cruelty of industrial poultry farming.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I am serious. I know that it is extremely cruel and I agree with you. I just think it’s weird that people are only selectively outraged with this and not with the animal cruelty that happens to the chickens that are for eating.

For example if I had to choose between being a male chick born in the egg industry or in the cock fighting business I would probably choose the fighting since I would rather fight for my life than be put in a blender alive? Maybe that’s not a common opinion and people think that’s more humane than fighting.

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

People need to eat, they don't need cruel entertainment. And no, eating meat isn't the same as entertainment from watching animals fight.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

They don’t need to eat meat (according to all major dietician organizations). Since it is not out of necessity, it is for pleasure, same as watching animals fight.

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Not all countries do that btw.

Also, if we're really comparing, I don't think you'd have much thought on choices at 1 week old, considering you wouldn't even have self awareness.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Which countries don’t do this?

Human babies also don’t have self awareness. I don’t think that’s a trait that justifies killing someone.

[-] solomon42069@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Fair enough man. I definitely don't want any chickens or eggs from the Matrix style battery farms either! I have a feeling that you can taste the despair.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

98.3% of egg laying hens and 99% of meat chickens are factory farmed and even for that 1.7% of egg laying hens that are not factory farmed the male chicks are still usually macerated alive at one day old.

https://www.sentienceinstitute.org/us-factory-farming-estimates

If you don’t want those then please stop buying it to align your actions with your morals.

[-] solomon42069@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 3 weeks ago

Now do boxing and MMA.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I think that's a fair point. I feel like meat eaters often use the utility of the carcass to justify the death - "They use every part of the chicken, nothing goes to waste".

A lot of people do seem to think eating it is a more justifiable death then gambling on the life then disposing of the carcass, but maybe a beakless immobile battery hen would disagree.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

The “nothing goes to waste” argument just ignores the victims life though. They did not want to die.

Also seems like a pretty easy solution then to just eat the killed bird and bing bang bosh: cock fighting is morally justified.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

i Look at it this way. All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can't be immoral.

Causing suffering to the living certainly can be.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

All life gets eaten by something eventually, so consumption itself can’t be immoral.

Yeah we are not talking about the consumption part, we are talking about the killing part. If you find a dead squirrel or deer, it’s not immoral to eat them. Ending someone’s life against their will is though, it doesn’t really matter what your intentions are.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What if someone ran over that dead deer. They killed it. Is it okay to eat a dead thing if someone else kills it?

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Intention is what you’re looking for. It is immoral to intentionally kill someone.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I appreciate you sharing your moral perspective with me.

Do you have any fringe cases where intentionally killing someone is morally justified?

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

There is probably cases where you could try to morally justify anything (like in a survival situation I guess?) but I personally would try to abstain from killing under any circumstance.

The morals around eating animals are luckily not that vague. You do not need animal products to live (say all major dietician organizations) so the only reasons people are eating meat is out of habit or for taste. And pleasure does not justify killing a sentient being.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

you don't know what anyone needs. you're not their doctor or dietician.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

All major dietician organizations agree that living on a plant based diet can be healthy during any stage of life including infancy, pregnancy, etc

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

the AND no longer has that position. the Australian association based their findings on the AND position paper. and there are other associations which specifically do not recommend it during pregnancy and infancy. even the now-expired AND position paper was mostly about the possible dangers.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

there is no proof nonhuman animals understand personal mortality, so we can't say they have a will to live

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

A toddler or a mentally disabled person can’t understand morality. I wouldn’t personally kill and eat those.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think you misread mortality as morality

[-] amzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, you are right, I did. I believe the same can be said about mortality though.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

you could look for literature to support your claim.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

comparing mental disabled people to children is insulting. comparing them to animals is fucking gross.

[-] amzd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I did not compare them, they just have the trait you claimed was the justification for killing animals. Humans are animals and a subset of us have the trait you described. I just pointed out that is not a good justification.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't try to justify it at all. I said that you are making unfounded claims.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's such a prevalent attitude but I agree it doesn't hold water.

I suspect being unaware of the amount of unnecessary suffering in meat production probably plays a role too.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

"Wisconsins hot new bar has everything! Bowls of cocaine! Shots fired! And live chickens in the basement!"

[-] Today@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

When i read the headline i thought it was about the Wisconsin State Bar.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well that wouldn't be news now would it.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 7 points 3 weeks ago

You can't have any fun anymore!

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

According to the owner, the chickens were there (and I quote) "For eat", which I just love. Considering the drugs, the drug sales ledger and the ammo, I'm guessing cock fighting.b

[-] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 1 points 3 weeks ago

Locking thread. Comments are getting off-topic.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
148 points (100.0% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

973 readers
2 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS