83
submitted 1 day ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/usa@midwest.social

A proposal from the Department of Labor recommends the end of certificates that allow a subminimum wage for disabled people.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Get rid of all subminimum wages.

[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago

Damn if only they’d had four years to fix it. Alas.

[-] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Well what did the pastafarian say

I mean, weird promise but okay (so, all this time, you're telling me companies can pay disabled people below minimum wage)...

[-] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

imagine believing biden wants to do literally anything to help working class people lmao

Death to America

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

those with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Would these people get hired at all if they have to be paid minimum wage? I figure that they have the option of applying for jobs normally rather than through these programs, so they would already be doing so if they could get hired that way.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

No, they would not have jobs at all. With the extra supervision and care required, I seriously doubt these companies are saving money, and in fact are probably paying more than minimum wage at the end of the day.

I'm guessing it's more of a "put people to work so they can feel productive and good about themselves" rather than "evil capitalist plot".

OTOH, for all lemmy harps about the minimum wage, almost no one gets paid that.

The percentage of hourly paid workers earning the prevailing federal minimum wage or less edged down from 1.3 percent in 2022 to 1.1 percent in 2023. This remains well below the percentage of 13.4 recorded in 1979, when data were first collected on a regular basis.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/minimum-wage/2023/

So maybe paying them minimum wage wouldn't make a difference?

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

OTOH, for all lemmy harps about the minimum wage, almost no one gets paid that.

The percentage of hourly paid workers earning the prevailing federal minimum wage or less edged down from 1.3 percent in 2022 to 1.1 percent in 2023.

I don't think 3 million people is 'almost no one'.

And that's only what the statutory minimum wage is currently. If the minimum wage had kept up with inflation, it would be $25/hr by now. About a third of Americans make less than that.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

And that’s only what the statutory minimum wage is currently. If the minimum wage had kept up with inflation, it would be $25/hr by now. About a third of Americans make less than that.

Centrists consider that a win.

[-] m_f@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

OTOH, for all lemmy harps about the minimum wage, almost no one gets paid that.

Is that cause or effect? I.e., is nobody paid that because it's ridiculously low and hasn't kept up with inflation? If minimum wage was $0.01, then the number of people paid minimum wage would be 0%, but I don't think that's a good thing.

[-] Fosheze@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

but I don't think that's a good thing.

If we implemented reasonable a UBI then I could actually see eliminating minimum wage laws. There's not much reason to have a minimum wage if everyone is already guaranteed a minimum income.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

No your wrong go to your local Goodwill to see it in practice. They don't supervise them any more rhan someone at a normal job. But they hire a ton of disabled people.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

That is the logic behind allowing them to be paid less.

[-] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

There are more jobs than people, according to the government every month before retraction. So yes, yes they would, if companies are accurately reporting the lack of applicants.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

Will be removed in January anyway so why bother?

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That's the spirit!

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The more things Trump's administration has to remove, the longer it'll take for him to remove them. That's the logic behind people wanting stuff like this as a means of resisting the fascist takeover. Is it good logic? I dunno, but it's better than not resisting at all I guess

[-] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

When they have all the branches aligned, they can do almost anything quickly.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1946 readers
1262 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS