374
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Sen. Bernie Sanders urged President Biden to “very seriously” consider pre-emptive pardons for members of the Jan. 6 Committee after Trump threatened to jail them.

Trump has also pledged to pardon convicted Jan. 6 rioters, calling their imprisonment unjust.

Sanders condemned Trump’s remarks as authoritarian, while some Republicans, including Sen. Lindsey Graham, disagreed with Trump’s proposal.

Committee members, including Adam Schiff and Bennie Thompson, defended their work, calling Trump’s comments an attack on democracy and the rule of law.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 118 points 6 days ago

Right now, Biden could remove Trump, and the Supreme Court ruled he could not be held accountable while president.

I bet this post will be used against me as proof of a crime in the future. We'll just have to wait and see.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 days ago

A martyrdom so that cretin J.D. Vance gets to take over after him?

[-] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Nah, fuck it, go all the way. There's something up anyway. World leaders are becoming more frantic and desperate. They're scared of something.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Trouble is only the president is immune from prosecution, per SCOTUS. Unless Biden personally chokes the life out of Trump's flabby, orange body, someone else would be on the hook for murder

[-] bitwise@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)
  • Order his murder
  • Pardon those responsible
  • ???
  • Profit?

Not advocating, just saying the "logic" of complete immunity plus his pardon powers means he can just make it go away, right? (This is why the idea of prosecutorial immunity is a terrible one.)

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

I beg your pardon

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

He could remove SCOTUS too.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Im not sure about the USA, but in Romania you cant get punished for a crime if you were threatened by someone to do something(with a real chance of the threat happening), only the person who threatened you

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

In the united states the military has had it drilled into them that they have a legal obligation to disobey unlawful orders even when threatened. It's a little bit because of Nuremberg and a lot because of the massive number of war crimes we committed in Vietnam

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

Why do people think Trump would abide by pardons? He and many of the politicians supporting him have stomped all over tradition, procedure, and legal mandates.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago

He'll get the supreme court to allow a sitting president to cancel pardons but for some reason he'll be the only one that applies to if a Democrat tries to use that power at some point.

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A Democrat would say some shit about bipartisanship or something and never use that power and then get walked all over and allow the country to suffer.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago

It'd increase the amount of work he has to do and slow down his ability to act.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

He's a living rubber stamp. What else does he need to do? Do you think any ideas come up with before and during his presidency are his own?

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

The problem with this plan is that you can never get all edge cases. It’s almost like Pascal’s Wager. Pardons should go away entirely, IMO. If there is a problem with the justice system, fix the justice system. None of this selective amnesty shit.

[-] ef9357 6 points 5 days ago

How about urging Biden to preemptively protect women, reproductive rights, LGBTQIA+, immigrants, and any other vulnerable population? THAT’S how Biden can redeem himself, if he even cares.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

Cat is out of the box already. No point in pretending it is still in there.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Preemptive pardoning of legal actions feels like if it's legal then the pardon has gone way too far

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

What do you mean? Is it going too far to preemptively pardon the Death Corps? They are such nice people! Pardoning just in case, I'll take no further questions.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'm not even thinking of that. Death squads tend to wind up dealt with by reconstruction tribunals. I'm more worried about people like Oliver North, Roger Stone, J. Edgar Hoover, and Roy Cohn. As well as the entirety of the Nixon administration and campaigns.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Definitely, it would at least establish a precedent if they aren't held, which is something Trump would then not be able to abuse.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Good point. It's win/win (so Biden probably won't do it).

But either they hold, and we don't have to watch these people get put in prison or possibly executed for doing their jobs correctly, or they don't, and it sets the precedent that pre-emptive pardons don't work, and therefore they're not an option for Trump.

Not that precedent has stopped these people before...

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
374 points (96.8% liked)

News

23625 readers
2841 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS