this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23208 readers
146 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Dark Crystal is the precursor to Jim Henson's cult-classic Labyrinth, which I saw first before coming to this movie. It's about a young hero who sets out to bring a shard of the Dark Crystal to heal it and restore the world. I always thought The Dark Crystal would be a different watch because even though the director is the same for both movies, they have a very major difference in my opinion. That difference is the lack of any humans whatsoever in the movie. You see, The Dark Crystal is a high-fantasy type of film, set in it's own world and mythology and history. That alone makes things difficult for me, because I have never been able to watch LOTR: TFOTR without falling asleep and sure enough, I yawned through the entire third act and actually closed my eyes and half-slept through the brief credits before realizing the movie was over.

The presentation aspect of this is much more focused than Labyrinth's, while the later movie feels grander simply because it leads through many different looking places and settings, The Dark Crystal feels better realized and just as well good because the one setting it primarily uses, the forest, is beautifully made with a lot of absurd and weird looking creatures. It's a classic visually insane film, aside from a few VFX shots that look dated as hell.

The second thing that I really enjoyed about this is the world-buikding, while the setup is the most basic of "Hero's Journey" stories that we have been getting ever since LOTR ig, the movie atleast earnestly makes up for it with a very unique world and mythology where the whole concept of quality is seen as actually being fractured from a single whole. This speaks to a very Buddhist mythology and theme which the film comes back to again and again, I really enjoy new world-building that is not obese with over-exposition and The Dark Crystal rarely says anything about it, preferring a visual presentation more.

The story, the acting, the direction everything is great. The puppets are amazing, they're so very expressive and fun to look at and there are more serious depictions of adult themes like slavery than in Labyrinth. During the start of the third-act, there is a very minor ass-pull that felt like I was cheated as an audience member but aside from that everything was fine.

The soundtrack doesn't really play an important role in the film but the sound design of all the different creatures and the world is atleast there to make up for it.

7.5/10 Again, It's not that I didn't like it. I do have opinions about it's aspects and how it's made and everything, it's just that I think I didn't enjoy it as much as Labyrinth which I gave a 9.5/10

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

i'm convinced that the 80's were the heyday of fantasy movies; the fantasy we get now-a-days is less fantastical because of the existence of humans.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wish Sword & Sorcery would make a comeback without all the reactionary elements present in the 80s. Frazetta paintings are so iconic and influential on modern fantasy it's amazing the genre hasn't gotten more modern adaptations.

The Spine of Night is the only title I can think of from the last decade or so.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... it’s amazing the genre hasn’t gotten more modern adaptations.

most of them were box office bombs; i don't ever expect to see them again unless they're written by tolkien, martin, or rowling.

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago

True. I think Conan the Barbarian with Arnold and Xena were like the only commercially successful movies/shows. Heavy Metal and Fire and Ice have a cult followings, but I don't think they made any money when they were released. The John Carter of Mars movie was a giant flop. kitty-birthday-sad

[–] Legendsofanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, they really embraced the fantastical elements and were imaginative af

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and they did it without being successful at the box office, most of them were flops and i think it was because they were so fantastical; i also think that's the reason why lord of the rings succeeds, since it's so much more familiar to non-fantasy movie goers.

[–] Legendsofanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Since there are humans and a medieval type setting in LOTR?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

yes and not just any humans; hot, meme-able ones. lol

[–] Legendsofanus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I just found out there's a prequel to this made by Netflix?! The trailer looks really good

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 4 points 2 months ago

The prequel series is surprisingly good. I think they wanted to do more seasons so it doesn't exactly resolve but IIRC it still brings compelling themes and visuals/puppetry.