this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
170 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4809 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Dear technology under capitalism... We just want healthcare, housing, etc... We don't fucking need swarms of robot insects.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Just today I was watching this video:

How we came to hate technology

[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen this episode of Black Mirror.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Fall into me

And drown inside me

I know you will see

The beauty of me

Also, I've seen this episode of Tom Scott.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How's this for an obscure reference? This reminded me of an episode of Max Headroom in which the wunderkind Bryce invented a robotic fly with a spycam that could be used to literally bug a room. They send it on a mission to uncover an evil plot and everyone is excitedly crowded around the screen and heaping praise on it. Then it manages to sneak into the evil lair where it promptly gets swatted, leaving Bryce shocked and devastated.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

They also did this in Spy Kids

[–] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It wont be long now before the nanobots exist and the Borg can finally take over. Resistance is futile.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

the Borg

Sounds like communism...

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 46 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

In the latest video about this by veritasium, he asked the researcher about ethics concern. the researcher insist that they dont care as humanity can decide for itself.

Meanwhile:

The new report also details the extent of MIT’s partnerships with Israeli military contractors like Elbit Systems, which supplies 85 percent of Israel’s killer drones, and Maersk, one of the world’s largest shipping companies, that has sent millions of pounds of military goods to Israel since the start of the war on Gaza. The Israeli military also sponsored several of the MIT projects with funds provided by the U.S. Defense Department.

https://theintercept.com/2025/01/16/mit-israel-military-funding-research-gaza/

[–] remer@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

“We are willing to ignore and downplay the ethical concerns as long as the money keeping coming in”

[–] shoo@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That researcher is a real life Dr. Hoenikker. Vonnegut is probably shrugging in his grave

[–] Sammy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

-…his mother was completely consumed by robotic bees. So it goes.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 8 points 15 hours ago

MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 14 hours ago

MIT also (indirectly) killed Aaron Swartz.

[–] double_quack@lemm.ee 63 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

We all know where this is gonna end...

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Surveillance drones everywhere.

[–] double_quack@lemm.ee 35 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Surveillance is the "nice" version of it.

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

And it sucks, when you think inside Star Wars, such small drones are used only in medical or expensive surveillance and military applications.

But in real life it can really be a swarm of things worse than scarabs in The Mummy.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I've low-key started to think the only reason we haven't seen autonomous hunter-killer drones yet is that nobody's willing to break the seal, and I'm scared for what happens when somebody finally does.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

They are definitely super willing to break the seal, just nobody has built a good target ID system yet that won't fire on civilians.

If you just need everyone in a 10 mile radius dead, you could send in the hunter bots, or you could just shell the area with heavy artillery from three countries away. We already have that problem solved. Once we have a reliable target ID system I guarantee you'll start seeing unmanned equipment in war.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Horizon Zero Dawn looking more eminent any day now.

[–] double_quack@lemm.ee 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My dear stranger, those already exist, and have been used in war to terminate key individuals.

We are living the dream.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 20 points 20 hours ago

key individuals

Such as Palestinian children

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Point me towards systems that don't have a human in the loop, particularly any that utilize fully-autonomous swarms, and I'll agree. Scary as the former are, there's a world of difference between a handful of FPV suicide drones, and a cloud of HL2-Manhack-esque things operating on face-recogniton-guided autopilot.

[–] double_quack@lemm.ee 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, that's what you mean... yeah, there are humans behind, but potato potato, swap one brain for another... anyway it is a killing machine that can get you anywhere in the planet.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The humans are using ai to pick the targets they kill anyway. They theoretically are supposed to parse out the bad targets, but we know from examples listed in the above, that for genocidal states like Israel, that review is intentionally ignored or minimized.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 45 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I'd rather just have bees.

[–] MonkeyTown@midwest.social 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’d rather not have robot bees. I’ve seen hated in the nation (black mirror episode).

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The MIT engineers agree. They said something to the effect of "If you could make a robotic bee, it wouldn't replace bees. It would be a terrible idea to try to use them for pollination... Just put that same amount of finding into conservation and researching bees, you would have a much better result."

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

But how can techbros get rich from bees? Bees just make themselves for free then serve the greater good, the little buzzing communists.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago

Even birds are starting to seem acceptable

[–] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Because developing a replacement for bees is certainly a better solution then saving the bees...

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They think there will be more profit in it, especially since bees can't be repurposed as weapons.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 27 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

The new technology could increase crop yields dramatically without harming the environment.

That's a surprisingly benign use case, I was expecting far worse.

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

I guess I'm the only one thinking about how it's inevitable that birds and other animals will mistake them for real insects and die from ingesting these things, god knows what kind of toxic materials they're made of but I'm willing to bet it's not safe to eat them

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Without a doubt they will have those other use cases in mind too. Mentioning them is just not good for marketing in public.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Plot twist: The crop is human misery.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Well then fucking harvest me and get it over with

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 16 points 20 hours ago

The public use case.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 16 points 21 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Someplaceunknown@fedia.io 10 points 20 hours ago

Nope, I’m out

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Looks like they hovered for 1000 seconds. It was previously stress limited such that the joints would break after just a few seconds. I think they might still be tethered for a power source, I haven't seen any of these micro flapping bots include a battery yet, and they didn't mention that they did.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adp4256

load more comments
view more: next ›