1047
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago

There's several Shakespeare plays involving cross-dressing. So basically they're going to outlaw Shakespeare.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

They already banned Shakespeare in several schools for being too sexual.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

Sigh. Of course they did...

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Anyone remember the bit in the Bible where lot gets drunk and rapes his daughters?

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 44 points 1 year ago

No but I remember the part where they get him drunk and they rape him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Republicans see no issue with banning Shakespeare and any other expression of art

[-] _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Or knowledge. Keeping their constituents dumb and illiterate is the only way they can get votes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Republicans only care about Shakespeare, beethoven, and other such classical plays and music when they can use it as a dog whistle in order to imply an inherent criminality and inferiority present in Black Culture

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kredditacc@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago

The longer the Americans focus their attention to the culture war, the less likely they pay attention to economic issues.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Or an ongoing, exponentially worsening global climate catastrophe.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago

Shame that it seems to be working...

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

We need to start hammering them. The media clearly is unwilling or unable to do it. Every time one of those right-wing family value fuckers starts talking about this stuff yell some catchphrase at them like

"How about rent?" "What about the rising debt?" "Why isn't insulin free?".

I am going to start with my local ones.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

Don’t let Republicans pretend they care about children while allowing them to get slaughtered in the classroom and raped at bible camp and forcing them to give birth,

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 34 points 1 year ago

allowing them to get slaughtered in the classroom and raped at bible camp and forcing them to give birth,

while restricting the books they can read.

First things first.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vlad76 92 points 1 year ago

This is exactly why the 1st amendment is so important.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I have no idea who down voted you, but here, have it back.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago

I drove through a tiny rural town, population 4300, in my province earlier this summer, which barely has enough people living there to support running a donut shop, let alone any sort of drag venue, and some idiot had signs at the end of his driveway saying "No more kids at drag shows!". I mean, it's literally the asshole of northern Ontario, a drag queen has never had a reason to go anywhere near there, he's obviously never left the town in his life, let alone seen a drag queen in person, and yet he paid to put up signs on his driveway people will mostly ignore about a subject that has nothing to do with him. Conservativism really is like a brain fever or something. The things they believe are so exquisitely stupid.

Anyway, I love drag and want to marry Naomi Smalls, and I'm hopeful this psychotic legislation in the US all gets struck down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] victron@programming.dev 52 points 1 year ago

This feels so stupid. There are people out there that really want to ban such shows? It's an art like any other. What's next, ban street mimes? Make improv ilegal?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago

It's part of the Republicans' strategy to stir up trans panic and use it as a wedge issue. Drag is only tangentially connected to trans people but their voters don't know that.

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Men portrayed women for thousands of years until western societies began allowing female actors join their troupes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

I mean they're already implementing what is next: Making it illegal to look/be trans in public

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Bibi_Blush@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 1 year ago

Imagine getting your knickers in a knot over a creative performance no one is forcing you to attend and is harming no one. I’d love a drag queen reading me the Little Engine that Could or whatever (not a child, dont have a child, don’t know kids books these days)

[-] LostDeer@infosec.pub 29 points 1 year ago

I know of a judge who would be happy to disagree… once he’s back from his 5th vacation trip this month.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

You would essential have to outlaw all acting.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1047 points (95.0% liked)

News

23625 readers
3328 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS