this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
383 points (98.5% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

1568 readers
242 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Trump Derangement Syndrome... Otherwise known as being rightfully angry/shocked/horrified at the things Trump has been allowed to get away with doing and keep doing - things that would've landed the average person in jail for multiple lifetimes.

I mean for fuck's sake guy literally embezzled a charity, yet we're crazy for thinking he's a morally bankrupt person?

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago

He obviously needed the money more than the charity did.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, seeing and then talking about crimes is a disorder! /s

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 29 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lol is Trump Derangement Syndrome seriously not used to describe those crazy pro trump people?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 38 points 2 months ago

No, unfortunately it's used like the image shows. Get into a conversation with a Magoo about the terrible things Trump does/has done and they'll resort to "you people just have Trump derangement syndrome, he lives rent free in your heads all day!"

Then they'll go "HuNtEr BiDeN! BuRiSmA!"

...

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Trump derangement syndrome was originally about the hysterical articles about inconsequential comments/actions Trump made during his first term. It's like the tan suit outrage. It's since morphed into anything critical of Trump. Just like woke went from extreme virtue signalling to just being not racist.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol seriously. I don’t pay attention to a lot of the whole woke argument but when I do I’m like “this just seems like it just has a black character in it.”

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Now it means showing any empathy at all

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago

Woke means being aware of racial prejudice. If you're black, you tell your friends to stay woke. Because if they aren't woke, and they treat a police officer like a human being, they could be killed. If you're woke, you treat police officers like rabid dogs. Dangerous animals. You don't let your guard down.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Derangement Syndrome typically refers to the critics of President rather than the supporters.

This goes back, at the very least, to the Clinton Era. The Clinton media allies coined the term (Clinton Derangement Syndrome) to describe right-wing critics who would go on long AM Radio broadcast tirades about how everything about the Clinton administration - from trade policy with China to Hilary's exposed upper calf - was undermining America and making life miserable.

Republicans adopted it under Bush. Then liberals re-adopted it under Obama. Then it was a Trump thing. Then a Biden thing. Now we're back to insisting any criticism of Trump v2.0 is hysterical hate-mongering.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 9 points 2 months ago

God American media is fucking stupid. I’m sorry I asked. Now I’m just irritated.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Boy let’s hope so, or once Trump has our military licking his boots the rest of the world is going to be in big trouble.

[–] quoll 1 points 2 months ago

"blue pilled"