this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
74 points (84.3% liked)

Technology

69804 readers
3474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm holding out for Premium Lite Pro.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

Now with ads!

Nah, you better wait. I've heard that Youtube 2 is almost out.

[–] timroerstroem@feddit.dk 9 points 2 months ago

I think that's called grayjay.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So a way to remove ads at the cost of $ and better tracking. Instead, I'll stick with piped, greyjay, ublock, etc and make it harder to track me and save the $.

Fuck Google.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have no problem paying, just let me use my app of choice, without ads, and don't track me. If YouTube did that, I'd be a paying customer instead of a leech. I pay for Nebula and watch on Grayjay, so I do put my money where my mouth is.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 26 points 2 months ago

YouTube Music Premium costs $10.99, while YouTube Premium is $13.99. It remains to be seen how much cheaper YouTube Premium Lite

Nice advert... Nice touch to not include the price.

Fucking parasites

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Still doesn't allow background playback though, so it's useless to me

[–] Slaxis@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And that’s why I sideload a modified YouTube that includes ad blockers, sponsor segment skipping and background playback, among other things.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I won't pay for YouTube almost solely because Revanced is such a better experience than YT could be. They cannot bundle in Sponsor block without an outrage.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree, but Premium does let you skip over frequently skipped sections.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Oh I didn't know that. That admittedly changes things somewhat. Google still makes enough money from me though.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Try Grayjay. It supports background playback.

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

9to5GaggingOnGooglesBalls

[–] WiseWoodchuck@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I've always wondered why Google doesn't include a YouTube subscription with YouTube TV. They charge enough for it already...

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

Because why make less money when you can make more money

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago

Because you haven't approached the situation with the mindset of a careless greedy fuck.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Why would the actively make search worse to try and drive engagement time?

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Is that like PipePipe for idiots?

[–] Bali@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I feel the battle will get harder for extractor like NewPipe. I really hope NewPipe will always work despite Google constantly changing their YouTube code.

[–] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Didn't they already have this before but removed it? At least in my country a "lite"-variant was available but they removed it like last year.

[–] vhstape 3 points 2 months ago

That’s quite the oxymoron

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

They've needed this for a long time.