this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
350 points (98.1% liked)

196

5100 readers
876 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sadly not an actual line from FFT, but it fits the tone tbqh

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

As an FFT enjoyer, all I can think is "who the fuck is that red haired guy?"

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thats not one of the half brothers?

[–] MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That’s Zalbag on the right, but Dycedarg has a beard, and a frumpy robe too I think.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Great, now I have to play through again.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Its a great game to emulate on your phone... just saying

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the dude on the left I don't recognize at all. Dycedarg also has a toupee of sorts and doesn't appear in any of these "outside" scenes in Chapter 1

From memory, that scene has Alma and Tieta (Teta? Delita's sister) approach the 3 young soldiers (Ramza, Delita, Algus) and Zalbaag gives some info that Ramza was looking for, waving his hand afterwards.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lol i assumed it was an actual FFT line. Nice work

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago

it's close enough to the themes that i assumed it was in a different translation

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This distinction isn’t as profound as it seems. Why do humans accumulate extreme wealth? Why does a fox engage in surplus killing when it gets into a henhouse? The answer to these two questions is the same: nature was solving one kind of problem (scarcity) in a way that utterly fails to handle the opposite problem (abundance).

Now you might say “billionaires are different from foxes, billionaires have a choice!” But then if they chose differently, they wouldn’t become billionaires in the first place. Thus all billionaires are people who could not resist the lure of wealth (for whatever reason).

It’s a selective process, no different in mechanics from natural selection. Hence the meaninglessness of the natural/man-made distinction here.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe we should engage in some natural selection of our own. I hear the French have some revolutionary techniques for it.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sometimes we just have to cull the problem members of the herd.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Of course poverty is natural. That's why humans have always banded together to create wealth.

Frist thing a tribal society does is try to store up food and create tools to get more food.

Then they try to get clothes and shelter.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Of course poverty is natural.

Nope, you're wrong.

That’s why humans have always banded together to create wealth. Frist thing a tribal society does is try to store up food and create tools to get more food. Then they try to get clothes and shelter.

What you've described is literally just living and surviving. So... what, people who are experiencing poverty are just not working to acquire food, clothes, and shelter like they should be? Or is there something, unnatural, that prevents them from actually doing this?

Poverty is unnatural and is created by an unnatural system that is purely man-made. Your example actually demonstrates it perfectly, back before the invented system, people were free to survive the way they needed and were without poverty.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And how many children died before the age of five? How many people died of starvation?

People stopped living in caves and built farms because they were tired of dying.

There was never a golden age. We might be able to build one in the future, but life in the past was terrible.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Literally irrelevant to the topic of poverty and the system that creates it...

Unless you believe that medical care and general progress/advancement somehow necessitates poverty or something strange and incorrect like that

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As per Britannica, Poverty is the state of lacking a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions.

No one is born with material possessions, and the cave folks did their best to get hold of spears, tents, and other wealth so they wouldn't starve.

After a few thousand years of hard work a few tribes managed to have some stability. They possessed great knowledge.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Keywords: "usual or socially acceptable". To say that people in the distant past were living in poverty because they didn't have access to the same technologies and wealth we have today is ridiculous and a fundamental misunderstanding of poverty.

So... is it impoverished people just aren't doing the hard work to keep from starving that the great cave people did, then? Or...? 🙃

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're confusing "Poverty" and "Inequality."

The situation you're upset about is "inequality." The 99.9% getting screwed by a system that denies them the fruits of their labors.

You are forced to use a 'strawman" argument because you know I'm right, and lack the sense to just admit it.

And using an emoji always shows how carefully you've considered the other person's opinion.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh gee...

lacking a usual or socially acceptable amount

So... in other words... an inequal amount to others? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

It seems like inequality might be a key part of the definition of poverty that you've provided... 🤦

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll play your game.

So, who were the cave people unequal with? The tigers?

You can make anything sound stupid if you try hard enough.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

...Right... Exactly my point... The "cave people" were not experiencing poverty...

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I'll tell you what.

Go spend a week out in the woods with only stone tools. Then come back and tell me how 'wealthy' you felt.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So starving to death isn't poverty of food?

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stop spying on your mom.

jk

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be here if my mom didn't fuck someone.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

meh...you seem pretty bot to me...