this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
303 points (98.1% liked)

The Democratic People's™ Republic of Tankiejerk

815 readers
51 users here now

Dunking on Tankies from a leftist, anti-capitalist perspective.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and no bigotry of any kind.
  2. No tankies or right-wingers. Liberals are allowed so long as they are aware of this
  3. No genocide denial

We allow posts about tankie behavior even off fedi, shitposts, and rational, leftist discussion. For a more general community !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works is recommended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 55 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Does this image cause cognitive dissonance? Don’t worry. We simply redefine the word imperialism to make it definitionally not inclusive of these countries. Problem solved and it definitely won’t make us sound like lunatics to normal people!

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've seen racism reframed in a similar manner. It feels a bit sketchy

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TBH, redefining racism as "prejudice plus power" in an academic setting is way more useful, otherwise most "anti-racism" scolars would be researching the negative effects of PoC making fun of unseasoned food.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That does make sense, but it's just that some try to redefine it in regular conversations which has the exact same behaviour be either racism or not racism, depending on who says it and who is the recipient. And that just makes it weird, it goes against the common definition.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

To be fair: there is an imperialism definition by a Russian guy that conveniently excludes Russian imperialism

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

its not imperialism or genocide when you thump a different type of bible while you're doing it. Commies and tankies agree.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

"I will fight the thing defined by big countries getting bigger by letting different big countries get bigger."

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Here's a fun fact: Every country is west of something, because we live on a sphere. It's just a matter of degree. I can go to New York from California by going west. It'll just take longer.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

irregularly shaped ellipsoid

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

That’s the moons of mars.

[–] entropicdrift 3 points 4 days ago

The objectively correct answer

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

Check out Mr. Round Earth over here.

[–] belastend@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago

Spheroid propaganda.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That has to be satire, right? No way is someone that dense.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Your instance is still federated with grad, isn't it? Go take a look lol.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] JackLSauce@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago

Wowwwwwww....

Don't you mean "I'd rather not" or do you want to be a grammar commie?

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry liberals, but this is true. Politics only has two sides: America, and communism. And if you won't support AES states like Russia, China, North Korea, Afghanistan, and Puerto Rico, then you're an American neoliberal.

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As an idiot, I'm curious why Puerto Rico got lumped in with these other countries?

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 13 points 3 days ago

Puerto Rico is a socialist utopia and about as far from USA imperialist ideology as you can get. I mean, just listen to the name, it's so nonwhite!

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It must be said that those imperialist eastern nations all have absolutely fire flags

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All these tankies are happy Trump is in power now, right?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some of them are probably Russian bots and prop anyone regardless of tankies or MAGA, so long as the polarisation destabilises the West.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

@sovietfangirl

And into the trash that opinion goes.

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Hot take: non-white people are often racist

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"Often" is a bit too generalising for me. Non-white people can be racist, that's true, just as white people can. Any race has good and bad people.

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Originally I wrote "can" but that sounded like it was giving permission to be racist. Nobody should be classifying individuals based on their race. Bigotry is always bad - just because you're in the minority doesn't excuse you from the standards we set for everyone.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Ah, the ol' can/may conundrum. Every English teacher's favourite

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

I'd just say that people everywhere all quite often racist

[–] Aux@feddit.uk -2 points 3 days ago

All people are racist. The westerners just got good at hiding it.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

Username checks out.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 15 points 4 days ago

It's so like westerners to appropriate the cultural innovations of the Assyrians and claim it as they're own.