this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
858 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

68441 readers
4462 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 44 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And then when their anonymous airplanes crashed into each other, the world felt conflicted about it.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 5 points 6 days ago

Oh no that would be so sad. Please no.

[–] cute_noker@feddit.dk 1 points 6 days ago

Putin loves this simple hack

Well then...

As a #SovereignCitizen, I will not comply with FAA drone laws 😏

Bonus points: Y'all can use an app called Rattlegram to convert a sting of text into audio that can be played over amateur radio. And if you encrypt the text beforehand using encryption tools such as Secure Space Encryptor (known as Paranoia Text Encryption on iOS), or Open PGP (both are open source), before pasting the ciphertext into Rattlegram (also open source), you have encrypted off-grid communications.

This is #Murica! The president can ignore laws. So can we. 😎

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago

Luckily the FAA has no power in europe

[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago

These two are the least of out worries now.

Imagine this law in like 1999

[–] stucljr@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

That's just awesome 😬😬😬😬

[–] TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world 200 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait! Think about the children! What if we need to track pedophiles!?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The pedophiles are in power, except "real pedophilia is when the gays do it".

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago

Only poor antifascist trans people are pedophiles dummy. /s

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago

You mean Republicans? Yeah they won't allow that, silly

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 115 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So can guys like Epstein...

[–] Demonic74@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

What's the difference?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 31 points 1 week ago

It’s the same group of people. They’re buddies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This doesn't do anything, all these aircraft are already in trusts. You can still track them, the N number/ICAO ID is what people are using

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is actually most helpful to the little guys that own $20,000 airplanes.

I have a small airplane and it's always bothered me that my name and address are publicly accessible through the FAA registry.

Most pilots I know are careful about photos they publish online showing their tail number printed in large bold letters on either side of the aircraft. This registration number can be entered into websites like flightaware.com and someone is literally two clicks from seeing my full name and home address.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Why would you want to hide that information? As long as planes use public skies everyone should be identified. Thats like the very basics of every secure operation.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely air traffic in the sky should be identified. There is no problem with that, but it's the idea that it is too easy to find out everything about an aircraft owner by simply seeing the number on their tail.

The rich guys obfuscate that info with shell corps to own the aircraft.

Shouldn't everyone have the right to the same level of privacy regardless of how much money they have?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Maybe the rich guys shouldn't be able to it instead and thats what should change?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Just like with the cars.

You can find out anything as well with the license plates.

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

No you cannot. You cannot easily find someone's address from looking at their plate. You need more information, or to do some advanced searching. It is simply not the same.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If you own your own home, anyone can get your full name through property records. Is this really that different?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ChaoticCookie@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you take me for a ride on your plane?

[–] CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Anyone who isn’t rich in America can go fuck yourself is what they’ve been saying for a while in words and actions. Millionaires are the middle class today, actors and athletes and pop stars. Anything below is just a fucking scum fuck to them.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

millionaires are way above middle class, middle class is usually around depending on area, is 50k-100k.year. millionaires are way above that. they usually buy multimillionaire(5+million) dollar homes, and often sometimes have multiples. actors,c elebrities are hundred millionaires, they are very wealthy individuals, billionaires are just obscene.

[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 7 points 6 days ago

You're missing their point, they're saying from the point of view of those in power millionaires are middle class.

Although there are some that distinguish a "managerial class" that is in-between the middle class and the billionaires : people like CEOs and such, with net worth in the tens of millions but who are not those who benefit the most from the system and are culturally distinct. I think it's a useful concept personally, as their interests aren't necessarily the same as the owner class but they still have a lot of political power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 65 points 1 week ago

Appropriate

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope a traffic controller guides Elon's jet into the tarmac.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

even better, accidentally into trumps airforce one.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How about drones? If you don't want all of your information avaible online and don't want remoteid to directly tell anyone and everyone where you live you can request not to do any of that stuff, right? Oh no, this is just for rich people flying in private jets that can transport humans and tons of cargo.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Elon now can more easily buy his specialK, lol

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

all that premium cocaine from columbia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 50 points 1 week ago

Paparazzi can become useful by simply being the ones reporting the plane movement as they follow them around in person.

[–] revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think this will be a bigger boon to folks like Elevated Access than to the billionaires of the world. Makes it a little harder for some chud who doesn't like what they're doing to show up at a pilot's home with a rifle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is sort of like the depreciation tax benefit for private jets from the Trump tax cuts. I get it, I do, I just don't care for the government offering extra help for the types of people in this scenario. Let them manage with their billions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›