this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

movies

3393 readers
1124 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glebyglobster@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago

I enjoyed it greatly, it’s sad to hear that it had a disappointing turn-out.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh, I thought it released already since it β€žappeared” on my media center last weekend in a very good quality.

Tap for spoilerPretty good movie with a botched ending. As a person in chronic pain I particularly liked how Pattison played that gentle, accepting attitude you get toward repeated trauma. Sucks that the movie switched into Hollywood mode for the last part, it would be one of my all time favourites otherwise.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Looked like a neat movie i was interested in seeing I just don't like going to movie theaters now that OLED tvs and atmos sound systems exist.

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I was kind of hoping it would be this story about this guy that is trapped living forever unable to die. His mind is uploaded and then used for thousands of years. Always the one that goes on risky missions. All his memories are synced and he remembers every death.

It would be this kind of story about how this guy copes with his reality goes through all kinds of emotions starting with excitement then depression and nihilism and then ends where he embraces a form of insanity and absurdism.

Instead it was just a narrative about trump in space.

[–] Praxinoscope@lemm.ee 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's basically what the book is about

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago

Sick! looks like I got a new book to read.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 1 points 19 hours ago

Here's a good short story that is kind of similar: https://qntm.org/mmacevedo

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was an interesting movie I thought, not terrible but not great

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I enjoyed it, but it felt like it could've done with some editing.

Spoilers in which I try to figure out how I'd fix it, as if I know anything about thisTimo and Kai in particular both disappear for large stretches of the film after getting enough attention to be significant parts of the film but not enough to satisfactorily conclude their storylines. Maybe combining their roles would have worked? Replace Kai's brief romantic interest with Timo wanting his "friend" back. Timo wants Mickey 17 specifically because he won't push back on Timo's bullshit. That way the now-combined storyline for that character gets to feel much more complete and we're probably also taking less time to do it because we don't need to introduce Kai

I saw this in theaters, it was great! Wouldn't mind rewatching it at some point.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wanted to go see it but it’s been a busier month than I was expecting. I should do a better job of keeping my calendar up to date

[–] VacuumSauce@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

It was the same with Morbius for me. Please Sony re-release it πŸ₯Ί

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I honestly found this movie so boring that I went for a walk around the mall for a bit, half way through. The mall was mostly closed, so if two of my friends weren't still watching the film I would have gone home.

I grudgingly returned to the cinema and watched the incredibly boring conclusion.

And as someone else pointed out, it really was made with the intent to be a victory lap at trumps assumed failure at a second presidency, so that not actually being the case hangs over the movie rather embarassingly.

[–] Thegods14@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Movie was filmed in 2022, written before that, before he even confirmed he was running again. Of course people who reach this hard rarely look for facts, but rather, what their preconceived notions confirm to them.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Watch the film and tell me that Mark Ruffalo's character isn't meant to be Trump, his followers aren't meant to be MAGA cultists, and the explicit plot point of him losing two presidential elections isn't a reference to him losing to the Dems a second time.

So what if it was written before trump announced he was rerunning, most people could see where the tide was turning, and the movie pulls no punches in it's satire of him.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

So what if it was written before trump announced he was rerunning

I mean we all knew he was running again, that's not even a reach lol

[–] Thegods14@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I originally had a lengthy reply but ultimately realized we see the movie the same way, my only issue with what you've said here, then, is that the movie refers to two losses, but fail to mention that it never discusses a win.

This creates a layer of difference between the fictional universe and ours (nevermind the entire near-future, space-fairing-humanity nature of the plot), and continues to confirm that what the original comment said was a reach and not a fact.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Snowpiercer in space. Not that great

[–] Steve@communick.news 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

If you're going to oversimplify a story that much, remember there are only a couple dozen or so different stories, and they were all written thousands of years ago.

In this case, Mickey 17 would more accurately be Moses in Space, just like Snowpiecer is Moses on a Train. And since neither are original, neither are that great.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s the same director. It’s not the stretch you argue lol

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's irrelevant to my actual argument.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not everything new is based on something from a few thousand years ago. Sure you can argue anything

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 22 hours ago

"Based on" wouldn't be the right term. That would require some knowing intention to make a new version of an old story. I'm saying even if you try to make a new story, it'll either suck, or be very much like another story written thousands of years ago.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Moses on the polar express

[–] arsenyv@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I enjoyed it but definitely glad I didn't pay to see it in the theater. The first half of the movie wasn't very exciting because they already showed all of it in trailers.