this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025

33 points (71.4% liked)

Ban PitBulls

82 readers

1 users here now

Dog bite severity varies by the breed of dog, and studies have found that pit bull–type dogs have both a high rate of reported bites and a high rate of severe injuries, compared to other non–pit bull–type dogs.

Pit bull–type dogs are extensively used in the United States for dogfighting, a practice that has continued despite being outlawed. Several nations and jurisdictions restrict the ownership of pit bull–type dogs through breed-specific legislation.

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

Beaver@lemmy.ca

Indianapolis neighborhood in fear as pack of pit bulls wreak havoc (www.wishtv.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/banpitbulls@lemmy.ca

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand. This is America. Don't they have guns?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think pit bulls are immune to bullets??

Nobody test do not hurt the puppies it's not their fault. Just maybe phase em out thanks.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

People need to stop breeding them and muzzle the ones they have when they go out for a walk.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Actually I agree with you to an extent. I usually think that dogs are just doing dog stuff and they should not be held responsible just for being what they are.

What I was referring to, was that the answer most Americans seem to come to with problems involves shooting something. So I'm surprised this was not THEIR answer whether it was to shoot the dogs or to shoot the owner. That just seems like America these days.

That said, I actually read the article and the prospect of not being able to leave the house without being set upon by these powerful animals...well let's just say I wouldn't blame the neighbors for protecting themselves in this case. I mean if the neighbor isn't going to be held responsible and animal control isn't going to handle it, I'm kind of at a loss myself for what I would do. Maybe some bear spray?

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's fucking wild how many people hate dogs online, I never encounter these insane attitudes in person, but online everyone's out for dog blood for some reason.

Also, without looking, let me guess, Carmel or another wealthy area?

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pitbulls were artificially selected for dogfighting. They're not made for families.

[+] Sanctus@lemmy.world -23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So this is like your personal community for canine pseudoscience and eugenics?

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Dog bite injuries remain a common form of pediatric trauma. This single-institution study of 1616 consecutive dog bite injuries over 4 years revealed a much higher prevalence of dog bites as compared with other similar centers. Though inpatient admission was rare (9.8%), 58% of all patients required laceration repair, primarily in the emergency department. Infants were more than 4 times as likely to be bitten by the family dog and more than 6 times as likely to be bitten in the head/neck region. Children ≤5 years old were 62% more likely to require repair; and 5.5% of all patients required an operation. Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds. The relatively high regional prevalence and younger age of injured patients as compared with other centers is a topic of further study but should draw attention to interventions that can minimize child risk.

Source

ResearchGate is rated Pro-Science by Media Bias Fact Check

[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't ban the dogs. Ban irresponsible owners.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The research consistently shows that pit bulls have a higher rate of attacks.

[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's probably because they have a higher rate of irresponsible owners. I live in a neighborhood full of them. The worst thing that ever happened that I've personally witnessed was someone getting knocked down by a super happy and friendly one that jumped up and wanted to play, despite his abusive owners. Interestingly, a well-loved and very spoiled golden retriever female jumped out of her owner's vehicle to attack a very small dog.

The other day I was walking and the irresponsible owner of two male pits had their two unleashed, unpinned pits outside and unattended. The boisterous young male came bounding up and I simply said, "absolutely not!" firmly and he went away until I turned my back, then tried to follow me. A loud "no!" and foot stamp sent him back to his yard.

Honestly, they're just dogs. I imagine some can't be properly socialized, but most probably can.

[–] 52fighters 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People want to own all sorts of dangerous animals. Imagine my neighbor having a pet leopard and the cat being the cuddlyist thing ever and so cute. And even cuter for having someone dress her up in cute cat outfits. Sure, whatever, it is still something that could eat one of my kids and has the innate instinct to do exactly that, even if that instinct is currently dormant.

Pit bulls were designed to attack without regard to anything else. Once that instinct is triggered, their physical design turn them into killing machines. Pit bulls do not belong in homes. They belong in zoos.

[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

People have been breeding them as companions and farm/hunting dogs for over a century. It's not the dogs' fault humans are bloodthirsty, and zoos aren't the place for any animal. Nor are the dogs big cats, but guess what? Domesticated cats evolved from people who had relationships with big cats.

[–] 52fighters 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe we should stop breeding them. Maybe we should find humane ways to end the species.

[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Farmers rely on these dogs. I'm not adverse to the idea but that's a lot more work and requires a lot more involvement from society. We can't even keep people from owning alligators, venomous reptiles, spiders etc. writing letters and attending city council is something most people aren't willing to do once, let alone consistently, but feel free to do your part.

[–] 52fighters 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This breed has no special use for farmers. None. They don't run cattle, they attack cattle (stupidly). They are a pest.

We can’t even keep people from owning alligators

Actually, we do. There's a lengthy permit process in most states that makes it very difficult, very expensive, and requires a high degree of safegards. That's one reason why so few people own alligators.

[+] Maeve@kbin.earth -6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sir, xer, madam, I grew up in and in farm country. You know not of which you speak. Permitting only works for the honest. You can continue, I'm done. You've been offered a valid perspective and refuse further consideration. Good luck in your endeavors.

[–] 52fighters 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My work explicitly is with farmers, their land, and their equipment. There is zero use for pit bulls on farms. The only people around here who have them are drug abusing trash that move out to the country and let their dogs stir-up problems with their neighbors' cattle. No respectable person around here owns a pit bull. More than one has been shot by a rancher protecting his land.