this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13854 readers
666 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Latin "Burgus" (fortress) -> Frankish "burgz" (fortress, watchtower) -> Old High German "Burg" (castle, fortress) -> Hamburg (a city's name) -> hamburger (someone from Hamburg, a type or meat patty from there, a type of sandwich made with said patty.)-> English "burger"( A variant of said sandwich)

Latin "Burgus" (fortress) -> French "Bourg" (small town, historically the fortified part of a town, often more expensive because safer and better situated) -> French "bourgeois" (A person living in the Bourg, a wealthy person, a capitalist)

"Burger and "Bourgeois" are cognates. Eat the rich.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] awth13@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Burger King is an oxymoron.

[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"Rich" and "Noble" aren't really opposite words though?

[–] awth13@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In the context of bourgeois revolution, in the consequences of which we currently reside, the bourgeois and monarchy classes are opposites.

[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Britain and Spain and Norway and the rest seem to be running their monarchies just fine tho. I think it's been a long time since royal dynasties and capitalists were separate groups of people.

[–] awth13@hexbear.net 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I believe you're making a mistake Rosa Luxemburg touches on in her Reform or Revolution. A capitalist is not (necessarily) a person or a group of people but a manifestation of class division with respect to the relations to the means of production. Bourgeois revolutions across the world did not necessarily eliminate people or groups of people that are part of the monarchy apparatus, rather they eliminated monarchy as a distinct class in relation to the means of production, subsuming royal dynasties into the emergent capitalist class. When I was making my joke, I was thinking of that distinct class.

[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, in other words royals aren't distinct from capitalists anymore so Burger King isn't an oxymoron unless you're using centuries-old definitions.I think we're on the same page here really. Anyway this is kinda a lot of arguing over something simple, my bad. Have a nice gaming day if you celebrate.

[–] awth13@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Lol sorry we're kind of into using centuries-old definitions here since Marxism is, you know, centuries old. Have a nice day too :3

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago

Me explaining Marxism to an American:

“So imagine a bourgeoisie…”

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hamburg (a city's name)

Hamburgeoisie is a pretty appropriate name for that city i hear

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not as bad as munich though, being a port city it has quite a big amount of laborers

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, I hear Munich is scratched lib central

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago

"Burger and “Bourgeois” are cognates.

That explains so much.

CW: FuknSlammer AI meat

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Carnists are the vanguard.