this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
79 points (98.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

2976 readers
662 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, last November, at a polling site near them, would have been a good time to express that.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they did. Surely Führer Trump will fix healthcare, right? Right?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe it should have been on the ballot, then. harris didn't run on expanding healthcare. She ran on being a continuation of biden, who promised to revisit the public option and then didn't.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who the fuck are the last third?

[–] bingrazer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The last third aren’t necessarily ok with the healthcare situation, it’s just not their top concern. Some of them might be most concerned about being sent to a concentration camp or losing their job (which would affect their ability to afford health care plus a bunch of other stuff).

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm, if only Americans were capable of joining the dots between the issues they care about and the politicians they vote for.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden/Harris weren't gonna do shit to fix healthcare

[–] bingrazer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Indeed, but instead we get someone who will take a torch to it. One vote was for someone who would make things worse more slowly and the other was for someone who would make things very bad very quickly. We decided to go quickly.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One vote was for someone who would make things worse more slowly and the other was for someone who would make things very bad very quickly. We decided to go quickly.

People hate being railroaded. "We're going to make things worse more slowly than this other guy and we're your best viable choice. If that upsets you in any way, we're going to blame you when we lose." Is shitty messaging that appeals only to shitty people.

[–] bingrazer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I agree completely, the Democrats losing is entirely their fault. They’ve been unappealing for years so they can chase those corporate bribes. But if you listen to them it’s never their fault. I voted for them, but I didn’t like it.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

More like the affordability of gestures vaguely