this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
284 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

73450 readers
3819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 80 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Honestly, I've always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What about false positives? Or a process to challenge them?

But yes, I agree with the general idea.

[–] beejjorgensen 15 points 2 months ago

Or a process to challenge them?

😂😂😂😔

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

They will probably use the YouTube model - “you’re wrong and that’s it”.

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

Not sufficiently fascist leaning. It's coming, Palantir's just waiting for the go-ahead...

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago

Agreed. These jobs are overwhelmingly concentratedin developing nations and pay pathetic wages, too.

[–] brorodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Bsky already does that.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Yup.
It's a traumatic job/task that gets farmed to the cheapest supplier which is extremely unlikely to have suitable safe guards and care for their employees.

If I were implementing this, I would use a safer/stricter model with a human backed appeal system.
I would then use some metrics to generate an account reputation (verified ID, interaction with friends network, previous posts/moderation/appeals), and use that to either: auto-approve AI actions with no appeals (low rep); auto-approve AI actions with human appeal (moderate rep); AI actions must be approved by humans (high rep).

This way, high reputation accounts can still discuss & raise awareness of potentially moderatable topics as quickly as they happen (think breaking news kinda thing). Moderate reputation accounts can argue their case (in case of false positives). Low reputation accounts don't traumatize the moderators.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Great move for Facebook. It'll let them claim they're doing something to curb horrid content on the platform without actually doing anything.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

The marketing behind AI must feel like a runners high. “Something has AI”

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 24 points 2 months ago

moderation on facebook? i'm sure it can be found right next to bigfoot

(other than automated immediate nipple removal)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This might be the one time I'm okay with this. It's too hard on the humans that did this. I hope the AI won't "learn" to be cruel from this though, and I don't trust Meta to handle this gracefully.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

pretty common misconception about how “AI” works. models aren’t constantly learning. their weights are frozen before deployment. they can infer from context quite a bit, but they won’t meaningfully change without human intervention (for now)

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, you could hire people who would otherwise enjoy the things they moderate. Keep em from doing shit themselves.

But, if all the sadists, psychos, and pedos were moderating, it would be reddit, I guess.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My guess is you dont know how bad it is. These people at Meta has real PTSD, and it would absolutly benefit everyone, if this in any way could be automatic with AI.

Next question is though, do you trust Meta to moderate? Nah, should be an independent AI, they couldnt tinker with.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

Well hey that actually sounds like a job AI could be good at. Just give it a prompt like "tell me there are no privacy issues because we don't care" and it'll do just that!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Only if the also take the full legal responsibility for the AIs actions.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

They don’t even take responsibility for things now.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The business model IS dodging any kind of responsibility so... yeah, I think they'll pass.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago

In the other news: Meta pays another 3 billion Euro due to not following the DSA and getting banned in Europe.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think AI is positioned to make better decisions than execs. The money saved would be huge!

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The money saved goes where?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It goes to pay off the debt of all of the nations in the world and will then usher in a new age of peace, obviously.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

Haha. That says it all.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

A bold strategy, Cotton

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Would be a shame if people had so sift through AI generated gore before the bots like and comment it. But seriously, good on them.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That's gonna end well😉

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Following Tumblr's lead, I see...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh man, I may have to stop using this fascist sewer hose.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

great idea..!

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I've never had a horse in this race, and I never will - but I'm sure this will work out well for those who do. /s