Is there a steamdeck lemmy community? I quite liked having a place to talk about performance of some games or tweaks or releases.
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
41094 readers
236 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I think this could’ve great if it was an open standard but that’s not the apple way.
Don’t forget, FaceTime will be an open standard, aaaaany time now https://appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/07/apple_announces_open_standard_facetime_video_chat_for_iphone_4
I remember this and thought I was crazy. There was an article linked somewhere on Lemmy last week that addressed this. It seemed like it was a Steve Jobs special - no one knew he was going to promise that. Subsequently, they got tangled up in a patent dispute with someone who owned a very vague communications protocol patent. That outcome has been appealed, from both sides, in courts basically since then.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Idk, I see this as a plus. It sucks when one android user in a group chat gimps file sharing for everyone.
it sucks when Apple gimps file sharing for everyone by refusing to use standards
Fixed it for you. If Apple supported RCS this wouldn't happen. But I guess you prefer to follow Tim Cook's monopolistic solution and buy them an iPhone /s.
RCS doesn't have a cross-platform end-to-end encryption solution. For cross-platform communication, cross-platform 3rd party solutions such as Signal work well.
RCS would still be a benefit to incorporate without the E2E solution, as it would improve nearly every other aspect of communication over SMS/MMS.
I 100% agree that Apple wrong for not supporting RCS (and I am an iPhone user). However, I personally choose to only use E2E for my communication be that iMessage or Signal.
Oh, I agree and would love to do the same. However, moving any of my family who currently uses Android over to any other platform is impossible. I can't tell my wife I won't text her anymore unless she uses it. That won't go over well hahah
Where possible, I use encrypted communication, but if doing so would result in me cutting off a friend or family member, I won't do so.
However, I would love to be able to text Android users without crappy quality and the other limitations of SMS/MMS.
@RandomBit @jmcs I prefer #Matrix.
I don't find #Signal or #Telegram (which is worse, it's basically a honeypot) to be particularly secure, but I don't see anything other than something like those platforms catching on with the masses as a sort of #USA-centric #Whatsapp-style replacement for text messaging.
Both #Apple and #Google need to come up with a consensus on the successor for #MMS, or else I could see another platform or app replacing both.
What security issues does Signal have?
@RandomBit I'm not aware of exactly what issues #Signal has, but I know it's centralized so I'm not a big fan of that
Yes, it's not ideal. Decentralized key distribution seems to be a intractable problem for mass adoption.
@RandomBit That said if #Signal ever supports #RCS I'd strongly consider getting it, since half my siblings are on #RCS
Sort of off topic but are you replying from Mastodon?
@pootedesu Yep!
That is pretty cool. I'm just figuring out how this all works so seeing 2 platforms melding into one comment thread is still like magic to me.
There are two legitimate concerns about Signal: they use real phone numbers as identifiers, and you have to trust Signal as the server operator as they don't allow their client to be used with other servers. While the server software is also open source, you have to trust that they're running the same version in production.
I agree; however, the second point I don't see as Signal specific. In any service, how do you verify that a server is running unmodified open source code? For the vast majority of people, they are also depending upon the client being unmodified.
With e2e encryption, you don't need to trust the server, you only need to trust the clients.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I never understood the complaint. If iPhone users don't like the way Apple messaging works with Android contacts, they can just use an alternative like Whatsapp. Right?
Or they can bitch at Apple to fix their SMS/MMS problems.
Apple has a SMS/MMS problem the same way some people have a rodent problem.
Why would anyone want to sms? Modern messaging is much nicer experience.
Their problem is that iMessage falls back to that instead of them adopting RCS, and treats MMS in particular way worse (terrible image quality, etc)
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's mostly an issue that android users in the US don't use what's app
Facebook Messenger is more popular than WhatsApp here. So it's not like there aren't alternatives.
The point is that it's not really Android users' problem. There are options for iPhone users and, yes, if they really want to use the native iPhone messaging app they can complain to Tim Apple. Cc: @FuckFashMods@lib.lgbt
Yeah that's what I'm saying. Android users themselves don't care about modern messaging features. Some people do tho.
Are you implying that the RCS that comes with Google Messages is significantly less modern than whatever ships with iPhones?
Edit: Or, are you saying that most Android users wouldn't care if that was the case?
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm my experience, if iPhone users don't like the way Apple messaging works with Android contacts, they bitch at the person using Android telling them to get an iPhone.
load more comments
(8 replies)
I mean the right answer is something like Signal, but you have to really beat on people for that.
load more comments
(1 replies)
No way would i use an iphone. I outgrew its capabilities in 2010, spent 3 years not updating until i could get an untethered jailbreak and finally gave it up in 2013. I have helped people with iphones and ipads since then and nothing has convinced me to go back.
TBH I don't really want want to anything to do with people that see me as less because I don't have a fancy calling animation anyway.
Just use signal. In general.
The problem with Signal is there is no way to backup your messages on iOS. I’m a very pro-privacy and used Signal for a while but stopped. Being able to have backups of my conversations with loved ones is more important than having the utmost privacy to me.
Unfortunately this is what makes iPhones "iPhones"
They bring out features that generally make the phone part of the smartphone better to use.
RCS is still a mess on androids. And calling on iPhones is about to feel very modern while android phones will still be calling people the same way people did 20 years ago.
Who the fuck is using their phone to call people? ;)
When you say RCS is a mess on Android, what do you mean? I personally have not had issues.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
RCS could have been great if e2e were baked in from the start. Apple would not have had such a strong argument to stay with its own standard and we might not have found ourselves with this divide.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Oh no, Apple develops Apple-specific features to add value to their products! Someone alert the Department of Justice! My bubbles will NOT be discriminated against!
Hang on ... I set a picture on MY phone and then anyone I call sees MY picture? Oh yeah, can't see how this'll go wrong. How long before dick picks are sent, or advertisements, or someone finds a way to use it to hack someones phone.
I can see this could be useful, especially folks with eye sight issues (but how would this affect blind folks?), but it's just another way to tell someone who is calling. I don't answer my phone unless they're in my contact book already.
This seems eh to me, but I'm not an Apple person anyway.
load more comments
(8 replies)
view more: next ›