this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
519 points (99.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32638 readers
4616 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

The box is conveniently his home and bed too

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (7 children)

That movie made me so mad.

The book I, Robot is a series of short stories presenting situations where it seems like robots didn’t follow the three laws of robotics and then explaining how they were caught up in loopholes, essentially. It’s great.

In the movie, the loophole is: “We put a second brain in the robots that doesn’t follow the three laws of robotics.”

(I might be wrong, it’s been a very long time since I’ve read the book or seen the movie. This is just what I remember.)

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thing is, the movie started as a screenplay called Hardwired that had nothing to do with Asimov. They just slapped the name I, Robot onto it and changed a few character names because the studio had the IP and thought they'd get more sales that way.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

That makes so much more sense.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah. The worst part was that the main character was trying to figure out why there are robots attacking him and then during one fight scene his arms get wrecked and we see they are robot arms and I was like oooooh! he's a robot himself so the protections towards humans don't work for him! That's clever! And then the next scene he says he lost his arms and has robotic prosthetic ones and none of that mattered and the actual explanation was dumb.

That pissed me off so much.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago

Also in this scene, why was there an empty spot in the grid for the robot to blend into? If it took the place of another robot, what did it do with the remains of the other robot without time. A lot of "don't think about it too much" in this movie.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was not the loophole. That only applies to Sonny who was the only one capable of ignoring the 3 laws. The main computer (Vicky I think?) is the one who comes to the “we must enslave the humans to save the humans” conclusion all on her own.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

But none of that is in the book from what I remember. The 0th law of robotics wasn't introduced until much later in the robots series.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago

That's the loophole in the robot that turns out to be a good guy, the loophole in the AI that turns out to be the bad guy is accidentally deriving a zeroith law: protect humanity from individual humans, by taking away their freedom

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you read the original Asimov move script? I believe it was written back in the 70s. A special edition of the movie came with a paperback edition of the book version that was illustrated by Harlan Ellison.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 8 points 23 hours ago

It doesn’t resemble the movie Alex Proyas directed. It’s all short stories. It ends with a man having a fight with God, which they just scream math equations into the sky.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

It's the movie I hate the most. For one, the problem robot looked exactly like its creator. Also, don't they broach the topic of the 0th law, which isn't introduced until way later?

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

There’s a VR game that I think has a flat port as well, called The Last Worker. You basically play The Last human working at an obvious Amazon analogue. It’s pretty entertaining.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fuck .webp format. This bullshit format shows as a static image when you post it in group chats.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

That's on the platform, your anger is misdirected at the format.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It should be JpegXL, but WebP isn't an inherently bad format.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 1 points 55 minutes ago

Does that also support videos? JXL was made by google but now it's removed from chrome so I don't think it's making a comeback.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Barely any platforms support it. Do you know why? At the end of the day, if it's not being adopted then it's useless to encode images with it.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

But this is about animations and not images.

as a static image

Means that the format basically works, but the viewer/browser doesn’t support the animation extension … or more likely the animation got erroneously re-encoded and the extension was lost.

In the past it looked like some platforms generally move away from supporting animated images and converted them to videos or static images instead. Videos give you more control over the playback. animations either stop when they are done or loop for a fixed/infinite time. Videos can stop, pause, rewind etc.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Imagine when animated GIF's weren't yet supported.

useless to encode images with it.

You know, webp wasn't created for you. Websites switched to webp from jpg for better quality and bandwidth savings. Tell them how useless the format is.