this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
60 points (89.5% liked)

Movies

9638 readers
189 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Do people really see like the 7th or 8th in a film franchise? I personally have antibodies against any franchise that is more than a trilogy.

[–] kandykarter@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I miss the old days, where if a franchise got to 7 or 8 installments, the budget would have shrunk and the ideas would have become insane. In a just world, Jurassic Park 8 would be a straight-to-dvd release that takes place in space or something.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 11 points 1 day ago

Games don't waste your time, they get right to it by the 3rd installment.

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Jason X came to mind. Jason in space…brilliant!

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Drunk cast member in the background bumping the starships "computer" which is clearly cardboard.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, or they wouldn't make the movies.

For larger budget franchises see James Bond, Fast and Furious, Mission Impossible, Harry Potter, Star Wars, MCU, etc. Whether or not they hold up quality while isn't always consistent, but some do a decent job of keeping momentum.

Captain America: The winter Soldier and The Guardians of the Galaxy were the 8th and 9th released MCU filmed amd both top are tier movies in their own right.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With marvel, they were only starting to link a larger universe at that point. It wasn’t captain america 8. Each of the individual heroes has dwindles after a few outings.

I think James Bond is the only major franchise I can think of that has maintained a level of quality with that many movies. There is some up and down and a change in tone and style with new actors, though.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The Avengers was the 5th movie. Winter Soldier was an expansion on the already expansive franchise.

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Dude shut up, he wasn’t actually if people watch these movies—they make $8gazillion each time they come out, we know losers watch them.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

In this particular case, it's timing. Saw the reboot with my wife since we were excited to see the return. Both thought it was ok. Saw next one at home, and I think we skipped the 3rd. This is the 4th one in the reboot, right? Lol. This one, my wife is taking the kid to see it in theaters because now he is interested in dinosaurs and started watching some of the movies over the past year including the Netflix animated show (which i saw some of with him and from what I saw seemed way better than it should have been). So they release long enough, and you start getting new generations to take notice of who are young enough to not put so much thought into how awful they really are. The name sells.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Same here. I gave up after the 3rd in this one. It's a rare franchise that can maintain the quality of the original without resorting to gimmicks after that.

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For Jurassic Parks, I watch every single one. They're usually fun enough to turn off your brain and watch tense and thrilling dino carnage. I never watch any with unreasonably high expectations.

I enjoy the original so much I've seen it with a full symphony playing the sound track live and in sync, with the projector screen above them.

[–] mienshao@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I hate this comment. People like you are the reason asshole execs greenlight this god-awful sequels. Jurassic Park is an actually very good movie—and repeated trashy sequels ruin its legacy.

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Haha, dinosaur movies go brrrrrrrr.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only the original was good. Lost world was meh, and the rest is absolute trash. There’s just no way this one is possibly any good

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Life, uh, finds a way.

No, but seriously, the only way this "roars back to life" is with a complete, feathered overall of the dinosaurs on screen. 🤌🏼

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It's striking the number of those reviews compare it to and call it a rehash of Jurassic Park 3. Cuz from the trailer I saw I thought it might be the same movie.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Peter Bradshaw will give a hundred genre films 3 star reviews despite positive body text and then out of nowhere do a four or five star rating for the most mid thing ever (see Miami Vice).

[–] t_berium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Something, something beating a dead Tyrannosaurus.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, if anyone could bring it back it'd be her, and I'm glad they're finally dropping "world", all the jurassic worlds sucked. It needed something new if it'd continue.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's literally called Jurassic WORLD Rebirth.

Ah damn. My brain blocked that out