this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
766 points (99.1% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12851 readers
911 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plyth@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Bullshit without linking the studies.

It's also a muddy case whether the statements are about the existance of people or all people.

Some people run on facts, others on emotions. They have to be convinced differently.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 2 points 34 minutes ago

Somehow beautiful. Calling out bullshit, but also agreeing.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

Yeah it matters a lot how the conversation is set up.

Is it "you and I versus the facts"?

Or "you vs me"?

Competent people can disagree and also identify where the facts are missing and the assumptions begin that lead to this. It doesn't have to be a fight if they look at the data as something to discover together.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 64 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

One study I found is where they let people (their control group) check some data about effectiveness of a certain shampoo. They all found the correct answer. Then they let people do the exercise with the exact same data but said it was about gun control. Suddenly a part of the participants failed at basic math and had a lot of rationalizations.

Some folks will not just accept any fact or data that goes against a belief held by their peer group. Giving facts will even be seen as a personal attack.

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I think Veritasium did a video on that.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Would love to see it if you have a link.

[–] Pilon23@feddit.dk 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'd imagine this is what OP is referring to

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 52 minutes ago

Certainly is, thank you.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

well he was in a bit of a bind. If this had changed his mind, what would that say?

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I foresee two possibilities.

1: Coming face to face with their own mistake might put them into shock and they would simply pass out. 2: The realization could create a time paradox, the result of which could cause a chain reaction that would unravel the very fabric of the spacetime continuum and destroy the entire universe! Granted, that's a worst-case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well, that's a relief.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago

Things are more complicated than that. You have the guy you argue with who won't admit they're wrong but maybe in the aftermath will shift their opinion a little and after many discussions like that agree with you. Than there are many passive bystanders, undecided and won't comment but maybe find your point more persuasive

[–] NerdInSuspenders@leminal.space 25 points 11 hours ago
[–] loomy@lemy.lol 44 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

it matters a lot how the information is presented

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

That’s really it!

If it is a combative exchange neither side will concede.

It’s better to pretend to be ignorant or on their side and then ask questions that lead them to the truth you want them to see.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 minutes ago

Whenever I've tried to do this I get accused of "sealioning"

[–] Tahl_eN@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I actually react well to combative. Not right away, but it puts me into a "I'll show you" mood that drives me down a rabbit hole of research. If you're right, I come out the other side with the data and admit I was wrong. But I assume I'm not normal.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I do the same thing. I’m also perfectly comfortable saying I was wrong if I was, and most people aren’t. I assume you are the same.

No one person can know everything. But learning and updating the information that shapes my picture of reality is something enjoyable. I’d like it to be as accurate as possible. It blows my mind that many other people aren’t like that at all. No intellectual curiosity whatever.

Though I do prefer more even-keeled discussion over combative tone. It’s just unnecessary and produces bad feels.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I do the same thing and I am not at all comfortable in saying I was wrong if I was, but I generally do it anyway because, well, fair is fair and I was indeed wrong plus it's better than I discover it and will from there onwards be correct, that that I keep on spouting bullshit, so ultimatelly having been pointed out as wrong ended up as a win.

That said, if the other person was an asshole in our discussion (for example, using personal attacks and insults) I won't openly admit to them that I was wrong as I don't want to give them the satisfaction (though I'll internally accept I was wrong and correct my take from there onwards).

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, "normal" people have no time or are too lazy to do that.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 11 hours ago

This is a sign of emotional intelligence. When people get emotionally invested in their argument, they don't want to lose, and they often won't let themselves believe they can even lose even when they have.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

That’s both the strength and horror of LLMs. They are super good at presenting information in a pleasing way to the user… but can you trust that what it says is correct?

To the majority of humans, a pleasing presentation is treated as evidence of truth, despite that being a logical fallacy.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

That's just like your opinion, man

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 7 points 9 hours ago

Without seeing the studies, it's hard to know if they were good studies that support her position or not.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 hours ago

however, if he did change his mind, you would need wrong