Well see, a lot of businesses are B2B. Now yes for sure ultimately their customer's customer's customer is going to be a normal person. So eventually the lack of custom and with it, revenue will hit them. But, here's the thing I've observed about large organisations (not just businesses). I liken their operation to be very similar to insects. That is, they don't really plan ahead, they're reactive purely to stimuli, and mainly just do "what the other orgs are doing" without thinking about the effect beyond the only horizons they can see. Month end, quarter end and year end. Anything after the end of their current financial year. They're not even thinking about right now.
So, the point is, this logic while completely correct will fall on deaf ears.
Tons. I think if people read my opinions on AI they likely see me as a luddite.
My concerns are not about whether it's useful. It's that if the 1% use it to replace most actual workers, the lack of input will make future models actually worse than current ones, and at the very least would stifle innovation.
I'm very concerned about models built on the IP (voluntarily given or not) of people, being used to replace those same people.
I'm very concerned with where we go as a society if we do go down the route of losing so many jobs.
I'm concerned about the race to get the best model, using so much energy and natural resources.
But do I think AI is and can be a very powerful tool, to enhance productivity? Without a doubt it can.