this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
648 points (98.8% liked)

World News

35914 readers
617 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 79 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not going there even more now.

[–] bpalmerau@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

Stopped going when they made shit coffee.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago (3 children)

We stopped going. Our local coffee shop is better anyway.

Support your local businesses!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

First of all, before anyone gets excited, I get coffee from starbucks extremely rarely. A couple times a year tops.

That being said, I am not a supporter of starbucks.

Ok, now, my main point- For everyone in here just saying the coffee tastes like shit, Try to be more productive towards the conversation. The coffee tastes bad, is an obvious fallacy, as nearly 40 MILLION people drink their coffee. If the coffee tastes like shit, then don't order a oat milk vanilla pumpkin spice chai latte.

The conversation is around starbucks trying to bust up unions.

Saying- the coffee tastes like shit (when 40 million people drinks it), is not productive towards the conversation, and does nothing to assist with the conversation of starbucks being anti-human, anti-union, and treating their workers like slaves.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Their coffee tastes like shit and 40 million people have bad taste in coffee. The 2 can be true.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Taste is subjective! There can't be bad taste, there can only be stuff you don't like.

So don't be an asshat and look down on other people for what they like.

[–] golden_calf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's not the sugar that makes the coffee taste bad. It's that they over roast it. Their medium is basically a dark roast.

That said, yes the bigger issue is what they have become as a company and how badly they treat their employees.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago

Unions are great, honestly.

Instead of passively not going to Starbucks, actively support your local coffee shop instead as well. Their coffee are usually better and not burnt to a char anyways, plus, it's not like pumpkin spice lattes are only at Starbucks.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Who wakes up and gets in their car to drive to a starbucks to get their coffee? That's psycho shit. Why wouldn't you wake up and make yourself coffee at home and drink it while you do your morning stuff?

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

A lot of people aren't buying a regular cup of coffee. They do the iced ones with whipped cream and caramel. All the dessert type of drinks. At least that's what I always see people drinking in the morning.

I do it at home but I've been known to stop to my local equivalent of Starbucks instead every once in a while when I don't have the time to set up the espresso machine and milk maker and then clean the whole thing afterwards.

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I don't understand why people like Starbucks so much. Their coffee is nasty and so is their food. But people are addicted to it. All my relatives have the app and spend like $50+ a week there.

Only reason I ever go is because I'm roadtripping at 6am and it's the only place open that early. The indie coffee shops don't open until 8am.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

Starbucks tried to open in Australia but failed to get any significant market share because Australians just prefer drinkable coffee.

[–] MrBananaMan@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Their coffee is nasty and so is their food.

That's subjective, and clearly a large portion of people disagree with it.

[–] Talaraine@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Because the masses always know what's best and haven't bought into a trend.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Honestly their forte is consistency. You'll damn near guaranteed to get the exact same cup of coffee/latte and sandwich in the middle of nowhere Arkansas as you are in downtown NYC.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

I just wish that consistent flavor was something more than ash.

Not joking, that is essentially the strategy. It's very hard to get coffee beans from a hundred different farms to taste the same all over the world. That task gets much much easier if you simply burn them to a crisp so that all the varied flavor gets burned away.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

Turns out that different people like different drinks. And that's perfectly fine.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Tbh a lot of gas stations are using better coffee. A lot of people stop at Starbucks because it’s on the way to work, and they add caffeine, iirc, so their coffee is more addictive.

[–] DeepFriedDresden@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where are you that indie coffee shops aren't open at 6am? I just looked at all the coffee shops near me and they all open 6:30 or earlier except for one located inside a mall.

[–] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Boston. Indies open at 8am and close at 2pm. Starbucks is open like 6am-9pm. If I want a coffee at 3pm I am stuck with Starbucks or Dunkin Donuts. Indies can't afford to be open an extra 7 hours where they are doing very little business.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Redneck Florida here. We don't even have a Starbucks, but the locally owned coffee drive-thru is open early to get the high school kids.

[–] lumberjacked@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

For the same reason there are McDonalds everywhere. They are familiar and convenient despite almost always being inferior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kae@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Whether you go to Starbucks or not is kind of irrelevant. The broader population needs to know how Starbucks is anti-worker. They are happy to take more money from the consumer, and push the "partner" narrative, but it falls apart when the partners want to be treated with dignity.

That's a story everyone needs to hear before they spend $5+ on a drink.

[–] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The broader population needs to know how Starbucks is anti-worker

And what should the broader population do with that information?
Stop going to starbucks perhaps?

When you're against something you should stop financially support it.

[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When you're against something you should stop financially support it.

Yes. But it should be said, it cannot just stop there. People need to indicate to their various governments that union busting should be prosecuted no matter the billionaire doing the busting or the third party they hired.

I think too often people rely on the “you should vote with your wallet” that they forget, we cannot buy our way out of social ills. Spending our money on the “correct” product and not spending it on the “incorrect” product isn’t a panacea. And worse it can breed superficial support in companies to simply convince you to buy more of their shit. I think we’ve made enough memes about Eddard Stark warning us that with Pride month, the rainbows are coming to social media.

I think that’s the key point. Not going to Starbucks is one thing BUT it cannot stop there, otherwise no Real ™ change is actually going to happen. Lots of people are just tangentially caring about the issue for lots of various reasons. We need to implement change at every level. People should talk to their mayor, their city council, governor, State assembly, and what not.

Starbucks spends money so they can see results quickly, and since us common folks are not wealthy beyond belief, we’ve got to take the long and time expensive route. It cannot just be “just stop spending your money there” that alone is never going to work and breeds even worse results, with ads just pretending they’re buddy buddy with you.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you for this. I'm in just this position. I would never spend money at Starbucks. And I would like to support the workers efforts to unionize. So I'll look into ways that I can do that, and to spread the word about Starbuck's insidious anti-worker corporatism.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It reminds me when the Starbucks CEO pitched that he wants to run for president. And some random guy was like, "Wtf nooooo." And that single handedly destroyed his whole platform

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kinther@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Whenever someone mentions Starbucks, I bring up how when I worked there they allowed us to take tips. They don't anymore, so you're paid minimum wage (or there about), which is not enough to live on in most cities. They've changed tremendously and without unions backing their baristas, they are no better than any other fast food restaurant (which also should be unionized).

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Uh huh, I quit a while ago. Won't go back. Not Dunks, either.

[–] circuitfarmer 6 points 2 years ago

It should not at all be taking this long.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The same people calling for the boycott are not the same people buying Starbucks in the first place. They don't care lmao

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Boycotts are fairly useless. If folks who never shop there do it. I really am not sure who the hell you expect to call for a boycott. Other then their customers.

PS not one, don't drink coffee at all. Addicted to tea.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A moka pot and some illy coffee tastes better than any Starbucks I've tried and it's way cheaper.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElRenosaurusReg@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

Been boycotting Starbucks for years, ever since they showed their workers how little they care by giving them a meditation app instead of reasonable work expectations.

Still can't believe I wasted 4 years of my life working for that shithouse

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

i won't give the little shitbag who runs that company one more nickel

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Calls for a consumer boycott of Starbucks are growing amid mounting criticism of the coffee chain’s aggressive union-busting activities.

A boycott, supporters say, would aim to use consumer power to pressure Starbucks to stop its union-busting and illegal actions and to finally negotiate its first union contract.

The union has scheduled a nationwide Day of Action on 14 September to urge “customers and allies to join the fight” to get Starbucks to “respect workers’ fundamental right to organize and bargain a fair contract”.

Ganz said the grape boycott succeeded because not just farm workers backed it, but because “it was students, civil rights groups, churches, labor unions.

The former labor secretary Robert Reich, who is a Guardian columnist, said: “Until Starbucks enters into good-faith negotiations with its unionized employees – and ceases its union-busting efforts – we consumers must stop enabling this anti-worker, anti-union behavior.

Some labor experts say Starbucks is the country’s most notorious union buster since JP Stevens, a major textile company that mounted a fierce anti-union campaign in the 1960s and 1970s that included widespread illegalities.


The original article contains 1,209 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›