this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
121 points (96.9% liked)

politics

22733 readers
163 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's now become abundantly obvious Bernie/AOC and their "advice" was the cause of Zohran's recent slip up concerning "Globalize the Intifada"

He had meetings with those two shortly before his stumble, in hindsight AOC may have tried to pressure him to follow her lead as she was about to make a move concerning Israel, and what a move it was, complete capitulation that blew up in her face

The first thing Zohran did after winning the primary was give a speech before the New York DSA and affirm his socialism; compared to the positive reception he received from DSA and the toxic mess of AOC, it doesn't take a brilliant politician to figure which direction the winds blowing, Israel is fuckin toxic and Americans right and left are fed up with the cult of zionism even if they don't particularly care for Palestine

Zohran who has infinitely better political instincts than either Sanders or AOC, has a front row seat to the consequences of surrender, I doubt anyone is gonna splash red paint on Zohran's door in the near future

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 54 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It’s interesting that a holocaust with a higher death rate and a higher starvation rate than Auschwitz that is being live-streamed throughout the world 24/7 would be unpopular. You’d think some Democrats would have a focus group or something.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago

I thought their focus group was those two moderate Zionists in Schumer's head.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

a higher death rate and a higher starvation rate than Auschwitz

You've got to post some numbers to back up that up because most counts have well over 50-90% dead at Auschwitz. Are you talking about deaths over time here or what?

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

https://www.auschwitz.org/en/history/auschwitz-and-shoah/the-number-of-victims/

It took five years. We’re not yet to year 2. I’m talking deaths per day. Estimated death/missing rates forthcoming. My post was vague. “Starvation rate” should be “feeds its prisoners fewer calories per day than Auschwitz.”

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

This study of food distribution sites (by an Israeli academic using IDF population estimates) has been passed around as showing 377,000 missing in Gaza.

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi%3A10.7910%2FDVN%2FQB75LB

Some “debunking” articles note the inexact population count and IDF errors in counting. The best one I saw said the number is “at most” 200,000 fewer, which would make it 177,000 Gazans missing. A French tv station went this route. I thought “well, I don’t care anymore since it’s only 177,000 people.”

Here’s some recent deaths information.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(25)00812-8/fulltext

This is all pretty inexact. We’ll find out after it’s over. I’m hoping Israel doesn’t get the 5 years to show us their commitment.

[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago

Even the debunkers have it at "half the rate of Auschwitz". Oh gee I guess its not a real genocide then.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

has been passed around as showing 377,000 missing in Gaza.

This is since 2023 if I’m not mistaken

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 28 points 5 days ago (4 children)

aoc is only toxic on social media and, even then, only on particular spaces within platforms that don't shape narratives. see .world's progressive politics community and see how heavily downvoted all posts critical of aoc are for a perfect example of this.

a huge majority of americans still regard her and bernie as the answer to maga that will save all of them and they will fight anyone who says otherwise, tooth and nail, until their something happens to them that forces them to reconcile with reality; just like maga. (and just like maga who've had their spouses, mothers, children, etc. deports; many will continue to insist upon it anyways).

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 36 points 5 days ago

aoc is only toxic on social media

Then she's toxic in the only place she matters, AOC HAS ZERO pull with the levers of power in the Democratic Party, she is subordinate to them while being despised by the DNC brass and it's media allies, also Twitter is her worst enemy and unfortunately IT DOES in fact shape narratives in the wider culture and on top of that she's getting torn apart all over TikTok which......also shapes narratives among average Americans

see .world's progressive politics community

Why would I care what some dollar store 4chan wannabe subreddit has to say on anything? lmao the incel freaks on lemmy are not indicative of any motion within public consciousness, they're indicative of the worst of reddit and that's about it

a huge majority of americans still regard her and bernie as the answer to maga

A majority of Americans don't regard her or Sanders as anything, because the vast supermajority of Americans are apolitical lotus eaters, 56% of the country actively dislikes her in polling and that's before this debacle, she's not Sanders

She is a creature of her base, and after spending six years slowly starving it, she finally pushed it into a corner and she's getting bit

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC is just doing what the rank and file fascists want her to do

[–] Biddles@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

Do you disagree?

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago

From a sample size of 1 (my hairdresser), the normies are even souring on AOC and Bernie, AOC especially because being young a lot more is expected and she instead has become just another Dem

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No way on that last paragraph. Not even close to a “huge majority” of anyone.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You're right it's completely false, I'm frankly baffled how that lib nonsense above is getting upvoted, nobody bothers checking basic ass facts anymore

[–] rubber_chicken@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago

Where does luigi-dance rank these days?

[–] IsThisLoss@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] hollowmines@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the media keep trying to make a thing about a phrase he never actually uttered, I don't think sidestepping a trivial issue is in itself a "slip up" unless there's some evidence that there are flesh and blood people who actually give a shit. I also don't think it's clear that he did any of this based on their "advice."

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah exactly this, also he was very careful not to disavow or condemn anyone who does use the phrase and I genuinely appreciate that