505
submitted 11 months ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 162 points 11 months ago
[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately there are a lot of people that will see this as a "chad'' move.

[-] Xenxs@lemm.ee 127 points 11 months ago

Haha what a fucking loser.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 107 points 11 months ago

I honestly think using twitter is a mark against someone at this point.

[-] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I actually like how several businesses I know are no longer touching or using that hellscape. Hell or Twitter is where nazis go.

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 14 points 11 months ago

Absolutely. For a while I had sympathy for people who used it as their main business platform, but they've had time to adapt by now.

[-] nutbiggums@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

Like when they are wearing MAGA gear

[-] SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It’s still the best place for breaking Sports news so until the beat writers move off I’m gonna keep lurking.

[-] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

You're being downvoted but this is very true. And Twitter has sometimes made it difficult to see those Tweets when you don't have an account.

A number of sports journalists have joined Threads though. I don't care for Meta, but I'm still rooting for Threads as an alternative to Twitter so there would be a less scummy way to get sports updates.

[-] DarkDarkHouse 2 points 11 months ago

No reason Threads won’t become as scummy, if not more so. Why not root for Mastodon instead?

[-] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'm rooting for mastadon, but I'm also practical. User adoption is an important criteria and due to Mastadon's decentralized nature, it will always struggle against centralized services like Threads and Twitter.

I root for Threads because Muskrat is a piece of shit and I'd be delighted if his haphazard business venture failed. I never thought I'd say this about anyone, but Elon makes Zucky seem likable by comparison.

[-] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Because I don't think people like Woj are ever coming to Mastodon. I use Mastodon, but it is largely tech people.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 74 points 11 months ago

Hey Tesla auto workers, I’m so sorry to hear that every single one of you suddenly came down sick for the foreseeable future. I hope you get better precisely when the UAW strike is resolved!

[-] Soundhole@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This motherfucker. I hope he chokes.

EDIT: godamnit I was trying to respond to the meta thread. Sorry gravitas, not you.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

No worries!

[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 70 points 11 months ago

It's to the point that he might actually have benefitted the UAW by doing this.

It might well have reached the point that he's so widely recognized as a shallow, childish, fatuous, vindictive douchebag that he's a sort of reverse bellwether - his opposition to someone or something actually leads to increased overall support and his support leads to increased overall opposition.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

Oh no! Musk did a naughty on his White Supremacy social media.

[-] kitsuneofinari@yiffit.net 49 points 11 months ago

Union busting jackass...

[-] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

Elon is a piece of shit.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 40 points 11 months ago

It'd be interesting to see what Twitter/X's terms of service contract says about buying the blue checkmark (I can't be bothered to spend time on it). I'm sure there's something like "we can strip your checkmark if you don't pay us, if you maliciously impersonate someone, etc", but I can't imagine them having a clause saying "we can strip you of your checkmark if our racist narcissist CEO has a hissy fit, so there!" I'd love for UAW to sue X and Musk over their $8 checkmark, win, and then walk away from X and Musk.

[-] instamat@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

There’s probably a vague bullet point at the end, like on job descriptions. “Other duties as necessary.”

[-] breckenedge@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Fucking hell Lemmy is full of people who only read headlines. Worse here then Reddit.

Twitter’s verification policy temporarily removes verification from accounts that change profile pictures, which the UAW did in conjunction with the walkout.

[-] Sharpiemarker@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago

The headline seems intentionally misleading

[-] mibo80@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

no that totally makes sense cuz in the past when I changed my picture no one knew it was me even when my handle stayed the same. there was literally know way of knowing who I was so how could I possibly be verified, ya know? so, I get it the UAW, the - largest automotive workers union in the world which, has been currently announcing they'll be striking, forgot they couldn't do that as part of the TOS, I guess. I mean it's not like Muks has full control and does whatever he wants anyway.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago

Does he think, like, anybody at all actually gives a fuck?

[-] zzzz@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Look at it this way, this could have been a headline about the issues the union is striking over. Instead, it's a headline about a billionaire playing with internet checkmarks.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

What a small, pathetic little man..

[-] muertinez@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

oh nooo not my twitter verifactionnnnnn

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just as a reminder, if Nazism wasn't allowed on twitter, then Elon Musk would have to ban free speech like this.

Edit: Satire folks

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago
[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago

Why are you insulting fat people by associating them with him?

Or cowards?

Or pieces of shit?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

How petty of him.

[-] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Elon Musk is such a fuck.

[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Anyone know how to get around the paywall?

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

I didn't notice a paywall, but 12ft.io is pretty good at getting around them.

[-] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago
[-] mtchristo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Well deserved. why make yourself self a prisonner when you have the freedom to move to a better alternative

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
505 points (95.0% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS