this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
31 points (94.3% liked)

Movie News and Discussion

4858 readers
5 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Berttheduck@lemmy.ml 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

TLDR: Tomatoes got brought out by the company that owns Warner Brothers in 2016 and the average review score has been going up since then.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

TLDR

The article is a fun read though, tbh.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

shame metacritic's sources were all gamed too

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lol no

User ratings usually tell the story while the official ratings are usually the other way around

It's so easy to see where RT was paid for good numbers that it's laughable at this point.

Don't trust RT further than you can throw it

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

A tomato is famously a pretty throwable veg though... Unless it's so rotten it falls apart as you pick it up I guess 😄

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Usually look at the user ratings and it's a lot nicer than IMDB since they aggregate critic & user reviews.

[–] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I usually look it on rt before going to the movie, and it has not being working out last few years. 7s and 8s are straight up dogshit.

Any decent alternatives?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago
  1. audience ratings on RT

  2. Letterboxd (preferably, with time you pick out the users whose ratings and reviews you find useful)